Bunch of treble makers!Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 15:56A treble for Chelsea!
International Women's Football - Part IV
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Da I wonder if she doesn’t ask for a transfer in January. I think she should be gone after the season for sure, for her own sake. I know she was injured earlier but she is better than what they are putting out there.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Millie Bright getting it in the head with the lid of the cup and Sam Kerr chugging champagne was hilarious.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
I guess jonas rate frida more than jordan....however what he didnt realised is that the starting midfielder of his was already proven disastrous in 4 occasions (against aston villa, barcelona, man utd and this fa cup final)Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:08As a Chelsea fan, it is perplexing not to see Nobbs play more. Has she been bad with the time she’s been given? The midfield was not it today.
So proud of Chelsea’s back line as well. Carter was shaky in the first half at times but she had a great game otherwise. Everyone really showed up today. Impressive considering the international break.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Think Viv will enjoy the weather in Barcelona…
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Exactly, he is so stubbornGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:14I guess jonas rate frida more than jordan....however what he didnt realised is that the starting midfielder of his was already proven disastrous in 4 occasions (against aston villa, barcelona, man utd and this fa cup final)Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:08As a Chelsea fan, it is perplexing not to see Nobbs play more. Has she been bad with the time she’s been given? The midfield was not it today.
So proud of Chelsea’s back line as well. Carter was shaky in the first half at times but she had a great game otherwise. Everyone really showed up today. Impressive considering the international break.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
I really didn’t want her to leave but I think she might, because his “rotating” starting line-ups is also affecting her international career.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:12Da I wonder if she doesn’t ask for a transfer in January. I think she should be gone after the season for sure, for her own sake. I know she was injured earlier but she is better than what they are putting out there.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Arsenal NEEDED Williamson. That was the biggest difference between this game and the league opener. And also Hayes started Kirby and Kerr. Second round of league games will be interesting certainly.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Agree. Some are quick to slag her off as soon as she does a less good action, even if sad action was the only bad thing she did in a game. They have the image of Carter from the CL final on their minds. She's improved since. Now she needs to keep performing good for consistancy. The real test will come against Juventus but I seem to remember she did well in the away leg against them.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 15:46Never thought I would say this, but Carter has been good
With that said the Chelsea midfield covered the backline and gave the CBs support. That was what didn't work quite as well before.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
She seemed like she had a total of 30 seconds on the ball today, Blues backline absolutely pocketed her. Viv looked so dejected when they lost...Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:16Think Viv will enjoy the weather in Barcelona…
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
X2 the slowly asses of Jen and Moy totally disater I love Jen but no!!Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:21Arsenal NEEDED Williamson. That was the biggest difference between this game and the league opener. And also Hayes started Kirby and Kerr. Second round of league games will be interesting certainly.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
But she wouldn’t have even had that assist if it weren’t for someone winning her that set piece to even take
So you using a set piece assist to say Heath was good, you better give credit to the person that won it because she wouldn’t have had that assist otherwise.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Defenders always cop the blame. They can play 90% of the game great, but if they make mistakes during the other 10% that's all anyone remembers. Tough position to be in, but pleased with Carter's good performance.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:26Agree. Some are quick to slag her off as soon as she does a less good action, even if sad action was the only bad thing she did in a game. They have the image of Carter from the CL final on their minds. She's improved since. Now she needs to keep performing good for consistancy. The real test will come against Juventus but I seem to remember she did well in the away leg against them.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 15:46Never thought I would say this, but Carter has been good
With that said the Chelsea midfield covered the backline and gave the CBs support. That was what didn't work quite as well before.
But also what a difference from that first league match where Kerr didn't start (or maybe not even play at all??).
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Your right.The player getting the freekick worked hard to get it, while Heat comes in and playes a ball in, without any accuracy and is lucky it hit someone/anyone.da.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
I do think she loves Arsenal but realizes the jig is up there. And if she has ambitions to win Champions League then she’s gotta leave.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Heath was a wide forward which Arsenal doesn’t use. So I’m am not sure the point of bringing this up. If it’s to point out she’s playing out of her natural position the last few years, well then get over it because a lot of players (especially on that national team) play out of their natural positions.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Telford doing an insta live from the Chelsea celebrations.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
What is the point of this comment?Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Arsenal have been playing better without Miedema this season. If she leaves it'll be good for her and for the team.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Wide midfielder*Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:32Heath was a wide forward which Arsenal doesn’t use. So I’m am not sure the point of bringing this up. If it’s to point out she’s playing out of her natural position the last few years, well then get over it because a lot of players (especially on that national team) play out of their natural positions.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Someone brought up her stats but i didn't feel like replying to because I want no real part of it. I just felt like it should be pointed out. To be completely honest, I'm American and I didn't want her on the Olympic squad at all but I just felt like there should be honesty with what people are discussing.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:32Heath was a wide forward which Arsenal doesn’t use. So I’m am not sure the point of bringing this up. If it’s to point out she’s playing out of her natural position the last few years, well then get over it because a lot of players (especially on that national team) play out of their natural positions.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
And…?Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Also FYI just because you’re not quoting a conversation doesn’t mean you’re not engaging
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Heath can win a freekick herself(as can any other player) could parris have put in a great freekick like heath? Possibly, but doubtfulGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:28But she wouldn’t have even had that assist if it weren’t for someone winning her that set piece to even takeGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:06Winning a freekick is in no way comparable to taking one and getting an assist
So you using a set piece assist to say Heath was good, you better give credit to the person that won it because she wouldn’t have had that assist otherwise.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
No that wasn't the only difference you deluded arsenal fan. Even if she and Heath or Nobbs started they could have still lost with 3 goals or more. Chelsea had a plan for them no matter who played for Arsenal and they executed their plan to perfection. You are selectively forgetting this Chelsea side have spanked Arsenal's ass since the season arsenal won the league comfortably. And the earlier game these two teams played, chelsea were not in match form as they have played less and had less time to prepare for that and they also lost by offside goal. Arsenal were just lucky and today they didn't have that luck.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:21Arsenal NEEDED Williamson. That was the biggest difference between this game and the league opener. And also Hayes started Kirby and Kerr. Second round of league games will be interesting certainly.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Da Take this sit back to the US thread. We don’t care. We get your dont like Heath or don’t rate her. But we don’t care!Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:32Heath was a wide forward which Arsenal doesn’t use. So I’m am not sure the point of bringing this up. If it’s to point out she’s playing out of her natural position the last few years, well then get over it because a lot of players (especially on that national team) play out of their natural positions.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Yet Rapinoe’s stats are still amazing (and she didn’t start padding her stats with PKs until 2109) even though they played in the midfield for most of their timeGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:36Someone brought up her stats but i didn't feel like replying to because I want no real part of it. I just felt like it should be pointed out. To be completely honest, I'm American and I didn't want her on the Olympic squad at all but I just felt like there should be honesty with what people are discussing.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:32Heath was a wide forward which Arsenal doesn’t use. So I’m am not sure the point of bringing this up. If it’s to point out she’s playing out of her natural position the last few years, well then get over it because a lot of players (especially on that national team) play out of their natural positions.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
I don’t think you made the point you were trying to make.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
No. The biggest difference from the season opener was that Arsenal had already played CL and were further ahead in their preparations. The Chelsea they met in this final is in season. I never doubted Chelsea would be able to defeat Arsenal later on. They barely defeated an out of form Chelsea with that off side goal. Should've been a draw.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:21Arsenal NEEDED Williamson. That was the biggest difference between this game and the league opener. And also Hayes started Kirby and Kerr. Second round of league games will be interesting certainly.
Arsenal has defensive problems. It's not on the defenders. The issue is they don''t get any support from the midfield and they don't take max sprints to place themselves between the attacking player and the goal. That creates huge spaces for the opponents to exploit.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
I'm a Chelsea fanGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:38No that wasn't the only difference you deluded arsenal fan. Even if she and Heath or Nobbs started they could have still lost with 3 goals or more. Chelsea had a plan for them no matter who played for Arsenal and they executed their plan to perfection. You are selectively forgetting this Chelsea side have spanked Arsenal's ass since the season arsenal won the league comfortably. And the earlier game these two teams played, chelsea were not in match form as they have played less and had less time to prepare for that and they also lost by offside goal. Arsenal were just lucky and today they didn't have that luck.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:21Arsenal NEEDED Williamson. That was the biggest difference between this game and the league opener. And also Hayes started Kirby and Kerr. Second round of league games will be interesting certainly.
sorry not reading the rest after your first sentence
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Why doesn’t she have more assists thenGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:30Not engaging anything to do with Heath but it should be pointed out that Heath was a midfielder, not a forward from 2008-2016 just fyi. She wasn't a forward until the US changed from a 4-4-2 to a 4-3-3. Same as Rapinoe. Anyways continue, or stop whatever.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Why is Heath being discussed here? On both sides. My gosh. Stop. She didn’t play today. Shut up. Seriously. And now you are talking about her US career so that it to THAT thread
Also you all are responding to the resident Heath troll. And giving them the attention they want
Also you all are responding to the resident Heath troll. And giving them the attention they want
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Poor Bright getting knocked by the lid of the trophy
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
She kept holding it like a trooper.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
da Am a neutral and agreed, Leah was needed solely for her pace. That second goal, Lotte looked like a deer caught in headlight. Not sure whether she's actually very slow or she was hesitating but her reaction to that was terrible, like she was moving in slow motion.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:41I'm a Chelsea fanGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:38No that wasn't the only difference you deluded arsenal fan. Even if she and Heath or Nobbs started they could have still lost with 3 goals or more. Chelsea had a plan for them no matter who played for Arsenal and they executed their plan to perfection. You are selectively forgetting this Chelsea side have spanked Arsenal's ass since the season arsenal won the league comfortably. And the earlier game these two teams played, chelsea were not in match form as they have played less and had less time to prepare for that and they also lost by offside goal. Arsenal were just lucky and today they didn't have that luck.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:21Arsenal NEEDED Williamson. That was the biggest difference between this game and the league opener. And also Hayes started Kirby and Kerr. Second round of league games will be interesting certainly.
sorry not reading the rest after your first sentence
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
No she just got kicked, anyone can get kickedGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:32Your right.The player getting the freekick worked hard to get it, while Heat comes in and playes a ball in, without any accuracy and is lucky it hit someone/anyone.da.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:06Winning a freekick is in no way comparable to taking one and getting an assist
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Think Arsenal can bounce back for Thursday? I just hope the ref is good. Wubben-Moy is going to seriously hurt someone one day and McCabe is unnecessarily aggressive.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Same with keepers when they're hung out to dry by the backline. They get all the blame. Midfielders get away with more because they can "hide" more than keepers, defenders and forwards. Their mistakes aren't as noticeable to the naked eye.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:29Defenders always cop the blame. They can play 90% of the game great, but if they make mistakes during the other 10% that's all anyone remembers. Tough position to be in, but pleased with Carter's good performance.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:26Agree. Some are quick to slag her off as soon as she does a less good action, even if sad action was the only bad thing she did in a game. They have the image of Carter from the CL final on their minds. She's improved since. Now she needs to keep performing good for consistancy. The real test will come against Juventus but I seem to remember she did well in the away leg against them.Guest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 15:46Never thought I would say this, but Carter has been good
With that said the Chelsea midfield covered the backline and gave the CBs support. That was what didn't work quite as well before.
But also what a difference from that first league match where Kerr didn't start (or maybe not even play at all??).
Well, back then the Chelsea players came back from Olympics and the team didn't have a full pre season together. I don't think they had a single prep game with everyone back before the first league match. They weren't gamefit. Iirc Emma mentioned it was Millie's and Magda's first 90 minutes match. While Arsenal had already played 3 competitive matches.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Let's please talk about some non-Heath topics. If you were to give some special appreciation to a player today, who would you give it to? Whose performance surprised you?
The entire Chels lineup was excellent today, but I'm going to give some special appreciation to Ingle. I know she's a bit of a background character in conversations as opposed to our star forwards, but she's so consistently solid and dependable. I thought she was superb today, fast in transition, neat and precise passes, and some key interceptions in tight spots (there were a few that would've proceeded to dangerous chances had she not intercepted them).
Glad we have her on our team
The entire Chels lineup was excellent today, but I'm going to give some special appreciation to Ingle. I know she's a bit of a background character in conversations as opposed to our star forwards, but she's so consistently solid and dependable. I thought she was superb today, fast in transition, neat and precise passes, and some key interceptions in tight spots (there were a few that would've proceeded to dangerous chances had she not intercepted them).
Glad we have her on our team
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Might as well play Anna Patten as a cbGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:52Think Arsenal can bounce back for Thursday? I just hope the ref is good. Wubben-Moy is going to seriously hurt someone one day and McCabe is unnecessarily aggressive.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Arsenal are really gonna get straight up murdered in front of all those fans at the Emirates on Thursday if they play like that. #JonasOut
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Gonna double the amount of yellows they got last time they played BarcaGuest wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021, 16:52Think Arsenal can bounce back for Thursday? I just hope the ref is good. Wubben-Moy is going to seriously hurt someone one day and McCabe is unnecessarily aggressive.
Re: International Women's Football - Part IV
Barcelona are missing CGH, Oshoala and maybe Mapi.
I don't think it's gonna be that bad.
I don't think it's gonna be that bad.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 326 guests