Yeah she needs to get stronger for sure. I mean there’s no way kiana would stay another year right?Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 02:17They only have 1 PG coming in, #78. The others are all forwards. JVG is supposed to be the starting PG next season but from what I've seen in her conference play she has a lot of work to do this offseason. Easy to body off the ball, shooting can be more efficient, should be faster for a "short" PG. Tara might just have to go with a 3G 2F line up given all the talent she has for bigs.Odnehdh wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 01:57True. we’re gonna need Jana to step up. I’m not gonna be able to handle see jones carry up the ball lol love her but she turns the ball over too much. Anyone know if they have any good prospects coming in? I know uconn and SC are getting top playersGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 01:49That Stanford deep bench don't have any good pg thoSksisjj wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 01:33
They’ll be favored bc of the media bias but next year will be a fun one. Stanford will most likely lose Williams and Wilson but have such a deep bench that they will be a contender still. Then you have SC, uconn, and Maryland
Women's College Basketball
Re: Women's College Basketball
Re: Women's College Basketball
I think she plays too well off the ball and has too many turnovers for her to be a consistent PGGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 02:37Jones would be a Much better choice. DaGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 02:17They only have 1 PG coming in, #78. The others are all forwards. JVG is supposed to be the starting PG next season but from what I've seen in her conference play she has a lot of work to do this offseason. Easy to body off the ball, shooting can be more efficient, should be faster for a "short" PG. Tara might just have to go with a 3G 2F line up given all the talent she has for bigs.Odnehdh wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 01:57True. we’re gonna need Jana to step up. I’m not gonna be able to handle see jones carry up the ball lol love her but she turns the ball over too much. Anyone know if they have any good prospects coming in? I know uconn and SC are getting top players
Re: Women's College Basketball
It's only an option if she gets better when dribbling under pressure. She's almost too tall for it. Need to take more 3's too if she's going to run plays. But she has amazing court vision and has great assists. Problem is she doesn't protect the ball well when she's looking up to run the play. That first half against Louisville when they FCP'ed and forced Williams to pass to Jones so she ran the play is when Stanford struggled the mostGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 02:37Jones would be a Much better choice. DaGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 02:17They only have 1 PG coming in, #78. The others are all forwards. JVG is supposed to be the starting PG next season but from what I've seen in her conference play she has a lot of work to do this offseason. Easy to body off the ball, shooting can be more efficient, should be faster for a "short" PG. Tara might just have to go with a 3G 2F line up given all the talent she has for bigs.Odnehdh wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 01:57True. we’re gonna need Jana to step up. I’m not gonna be able to handle see jones carry up the ball lol love her but she turns the ball over too much. Anyone know if they have any good prospects coming in? I know uconn and SC are getting top players
Re: Women's College Basketball
There's a chance if she's unsatisfied with her end of the season but this year the draft is so weak, she risks more by staying another yearBghhnjk wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 02:44Yeah she needs to get stronger for sure. I mean there’s no way kiana would stay another year right?Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 02:17They only have 1 PG coming in, #78. The others are all forwards. JVG is supposed to be the starting PG next season but from what I've seen in her conference play she has a lot of work to do this offseason. Easy to body off the ball, shooting can be more efficient, should be faster for a "short" PG. Tara might just have to go with a 3G 2F line up given all the talent she has for bigs.Odnehdh wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 01:57True. we’re gonna need Jana to step up. I’m not gonna be able to handle see jones carry up the ball lol love her but she turns the ball over too much. Anyone know if they have any good prospects coming in? I know uconn and SC are getting top players
Re: Women's College Basketball
The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021

https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
The thing with uconn is besides Azzi they’re not gonna be getting a lot of minutes. They’ll play the same players this year majority of the minutes in close games. I mean they’ll get some minutes when they’re in their shitty ass conferenceGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
Did Obama chose stanford or baylor to win ? I remember he got them for the final
Re: Women's College Basketball
Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
#3 Saniya Rivers looks pretty good from her highlights on Youtube. A tall guard who can score and defend. SC is going to be tuff to stop next year.
Re: Women's College Basketball
I know my PAC-12 team, Oregon, is no where near the academic standards of Notre Dame and Stanford, but we recruit all over the world. We’ve gotten some real good players from Australia and Germany (the Sabally sisters). Washington State has the 2 Leger-Walker sisters from New Zealand that have turned their program around. People should think more globally, IMO.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
daWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:29I know my PAC-12 team, Oregon, is no where near the academic standards of Notre Dame and Stanford, but we recruit all over the world. We’ve gotten some real good players from Australia and Germany (the Sabally sisters). Washington State has the 2 Leger-Walker sisters from New Zealand that have turned their program around. People should think more globally, IMO.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Do you think if you guys could've gotten the "local" kids Van Lith and Brink, you could've won the title this year?
Re: Women's College Basketball
I was surprised and a little disappointed that Kara Lawson of Duke didn’t recruit any of the top 100 HS players. I wonder if shutting down the program this season lost them recruits. Players want to play. Ironically, I say that, but it was the Duke players who voted to shut down for the year. Kara let them make the decision.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
Yeah Stanford only recently started recruiting internationally. The first ever was Alanna Smith who went pro 2 years ago. They have another intl girl coming in next year but I don't know anything about her. Basketball in general is only just waking up to the fact that other countries are rising up to meet the US. I think the problem is that the really good intl kids go pro in their home countries and then can declare for the WNBA draft before 22.Wayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:29I know my PAC-12 team, Oregon, is no where near the academic standards of Notre Dame and Stanford, but we recruit all over the world. We’ve gotten some real good players from Australia and Germany (the Sabally sisters). Washington State has the 2 Leger-Walker sisters from New Zealand that have turned their program around. People should think more globally, IMO.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
Not really, but we might have made the Final Four. I’m happy we have Sedona Prince. Our biggest problem was too much youth. We had one returning Senior starter, Erin Boley. Our other starters were either Freshmen or new to our team. As good as Pao Pao is going to be, she didn’t feed the ball enough to Erin and Mikesell, our excellent outside shooters. Their early season shooting success disappeared by early January. Pao Pao was erratic. And our turnover issues haunted us from day 1. I am going to miss Boley so much. Sabrina knew how to use Erin’s shooting prowess effectively. That’s the thing with Freshman. You have to coach them up. But I have high hopes for next year, if we can evade the injuries bugaboo. Our defense was excellent most of the year. I think Kelly Graves is an excellent coach.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:34daWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:29I know my PAC-12 team, Oregon, is no where near the academic standards of Notre Dame and Stanford, but we recruit all over the world. We’ve gotten some real good players from Australia and Germany (the Sabally sisters). Washington State has the 2 Leger-Walker sisters from New Zealand that have turned their program around. People should think more globally, IMO.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54
Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.
Do you think if you guys could've gotten the "local" kids Van Lith and Brink, you could've won the title this year?
Re: Women's College Basketball
Espn's just released "Way-Too-Early Top 25 rankings" have the Ducks at #10 for next year.Wayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:53Not really, but we might have made the Final Four. I’m happy we have Sedona Prince. Our biggest problem was too much youth. We had one returning Senior starter, Erin Boley. Our other starters were either Freshmen or new to our team. As good as Pao Pao is going to be, she didn’t feed the ball enough to Erin and Mikesell, our excellent outside shooters. Their early season shooting success disappeared by early January. Pao Pao was erratic. And our turnover issues haunted us from day 1. I am going to miss Boley so much. Sabrina knew how to use Erin’s shooting prowess effectively. That’s the thing with Freshman. You have to coach them up. But I have high hopes for next year, if we can evade the injuries bugaboo. Our defense was excellent most of the year. I think Kelly Graves is an excellent coach.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:34daWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:29I know my PAC-12 team, Oregon, is no where near the academic standards of Notre Dame and Stanford, but we recruit all over the world. We’ve gotten some real good players from Australia and Germany (the Sabally sisters). Washington State has the 2 Leger-Walker sisters from New Zealand that have turned their program around. People should think more globally, IMO.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09
They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearby
Do you think if you guys could've gotten the "local" kids Van Lith and Brink, you could've won the title this year?
https://www.espn.com/womens-college-bas ... lina-looms
Re: Women's College Basketball
That’s an excellent observation and makes a lot of sense why we keep seeing so many international players being drafted highly.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:43Yeah Stanford only recently started recruiting internationally. The first ever was Alanna Smith who went pro 2 years ago. They have another intl girl coming in next year but I don't know anything about her. Basketball in general is only just waking up to the fact that other countries are rising up to meet the US. I think the problem is that the really good intl kids go pro in their home countries and then can declare for the WNBA draft before 22.Wayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:29I know my PAC-12 team, Oregon, is no where near the academic standards of Notre Dame and Stanford, but we recruit all over the world. We’ve gotten some real good players from Australia and Germany (the Sabally sisters). Washington State has the 2 Leger-Walker sisters from New Zealand that have turned their program around. People should think more globally, IMO.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54
Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Well 1 and 2 were no surprise. #10 seems reasonable for the Ducks. Wow, without Aari, they don’t even have Arizona in the Too 25. Do you think Dana will still go before Aari in the draft, after that fantastic showing by Aari the past 2 weeks? I have them neck and neck. Both overlooked due to their height. Big mistake. I thought Louisville would be above Baylor, but what do I know? I’d have Maryland over Stanford until the PG situation is clearer.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:10Espn's just released "Way-Too-Early Top 25 rankings" have the Ducks at #10 for next year.Wayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:53Not really, but we might have made the Final Four. I’m happy we have Sedona Prince. Our biggest problem was too much youth. We had one returning Senior starter, Erin Boley. Our other starters were either Freshmen or new to our team. As good as Pao Pao is going to be, she didn’t feed the ball enough to Erin and Mikesell, our excellent outside shooters. Their early season shooting success disappeared by early January. Pao Pao was erratic. And our turnover issues haunted us from day 1. I am going to miss Boley so much. Sabrina knew how to use Erin’s shooting prowess effectively. That’s the thing with Freshman. You have to coach them up. But I have high hopes for next year, if we can evade the injuries bugaboo. Our defense was excellent most of the year. I think Kelly Graves is an excellent coach.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:34daWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:29
I know my PAC-12 team, Oregon, is no where near the academic standards of Notre Dame and Stanford, but we recruit all over the world. We’ve gotten some real good players from Australia and Germany (the Sabally sisters). Washington State has the 2 Leger-Walker sisters from New Zealand that have turned their program around. People should think more globally, IMO.
Do you think if you guys could've gotten the "local" kids Van Lith and Brink, you could've won the title this year?
https://www.espn.com/womens-college-bas ... lina-looms
The team that they don’t have on the list, that I would - Washington State. Somewhere in the 20-25 range.
Re: Women's College Basketball
They'll be scary as hell next season.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball
Another thing, stanford don't have fans lol. Maples probably only filled quarter max with most of them old people during game day.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Re: Women's College Basketball

Do you mean regular seasons without Covid? That's crazy. When Sabrina was at Oregon, we actually out drew the MBB team by her senior year. I tried to get a ticket when my boss finally okayed a day off. They were sold out. And it wasn't against the top tier teams, so I was sure I could pick up a ticket. Nope.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:48Another thing, stanford don't have fans lol. Maples probably only filled quarter max with most of them old people during game day.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:09The all 5 of top 5 (and 7 of the top 15) recruits are going to Uconn and SC.![]()
https://www.espn.com/high-school/girls- ... class/2021
Stanford is always an excellent team. Why wouldn't they be supported? Scratches my head.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Well it's hard to get the students to care about sports, they barely care about football. Plus they have too many sports where they're really good in so just being national champions won't get a crazy turnout. I'm a Stanford wbb fan by way of wvb and wsoc and they have even worse attendance. The only thing I can see drawing a crowd is something going viral like the way UCLA gymnastics didWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:25
Do you mean regular seasons without Covid? That's crazy. When Sabrina was at Oregon, we actually out drew the MBB team by her senior year. I tried to get a ticket when my boss finally okayed a day off. They were sold out. And it wasn't against the top tier teams, so I was sure I could pick up a ticket. Nope.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:48Another thing, stanford don't have fans lol. Maples probably only filled quarter max with most of them old people during game day.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearbyGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:54
Looks like stanford only able to recruit kids from CA or west coast? I mean I know they won't win against uconn on recruiting no matter what.
Stanford is always an excellent team. Why wouldn't they be supported? Scratches my head.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Dana is usually a more efficient scorer than Aari except this post-season. Aari shot poorly during the season but got hot in the tournament until the last game. I think most teams would pick Dana ahead of Aari.Wayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:29Well 1 and 2 were no surprise. #10 seems reasonable for the Ducks. Wow, without Aari, they don’t even have Arizona in the Too 25. Do you think Dana will still go before Aari in the draft, after that fantastic showing by Aari the past 2 weeks? I have them neck and neck. Both overlooked due to their height. Big mistake. I thought Louisville would be above Baylor, but what do I know? I’d have Maryland over Stanford until the PG situation is clearer.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:10Espn's just released "Way-Too-Early Top 25 rankings" have the Ducks at #10 for next year.Wayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:53Not really, but we might have made the Final Four. I’m happy we have Sedona Prince. Our biggest problem was too much youth. We had one returning Senior starter, Erin Boley. Our other starters were either Freshmen or new to our team. As good as Pao Pao is going to be, she didn’t feed the ball enough to Erin and Mikesell, our excellent outside shooters. Their early season shooting success disappeared by early January. Pao Pao was erratic. And our turnover issues haunted us from day 1. I am going to miss Boley so much. Sabrina knew how to use Erin’s shooting prowess effectively. That’s the thing with Freshman. You have to coach them up. But I have high hopes for next year, if we can evade the injuries bugaboo. Our defense was excellent most of the year. I think Kelly Graves is an excellent coach.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:34
da
Do you think if you guys could've gotten the "local" kids Van Lith and Brink, you could've won the title this year?
https://www.espn.com/womens-college-bas ... lina-looms
The team that they don’t have on the list, that I would - Washington State. Somewhere in the 20-25 range.
I don't think Iowa is a top 10 team. Poor defense and no secondary playmaker.
Re: Women's College Basketball
daGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:40Well it's hard to get the students to care about sports, they barely care about football. Plus they have too many sports where they're really good in so just being national champions won't get a crazy turnout. I'm a Stanford wbb fan by way of wvb and wsoc and they have even worse attendance. The only thing I can see drawing a crowd is something going viral like the way UCLA gymnastics didWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:25
Do you mean regular seasons without Covid? That's crazy. When Sabrina was at Oregon, we actually out drew the MBB team by her senior year. I tried to get a ticket when my boss finally okayed a day off. They were sold out. And it wasn't against the top tier teams, so I was sure I could pick up a ticket. Nope.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:48Another thing, stanford don't have fans lol. Maples probably only filled quarter max with most of them old people during game day.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:09
They probably lose more recruits to Notre Dame since it's another great academic-athletic school and has had more success than Stanford in recent years. But with the rise of GSW and LA becoming a basketball city again I think more east coast kids will consider coming to Stanford/UCLA. I heard Brink chose Stanford because of Curry being nearby
Stanford is always an excellent team. Why wouldn't they be supported? Scratches my head.
To draw a crowd you need a dominant player. Stanford wbb doesn't have that.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Da no it's not that. Stanford have a small undergrad population. I think only a couple thousands? The community around them is also not that lively. That's why even their football game or mbb never packed either.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:55daGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:40Well it's hard to get the students to care about sports, they barely care about football. Plus they have too many sports where they're really good in so just being national champions won't get a crazy turnout. I'm a Stanford wbb fan by way of wvb and wsoc and they have even worse attendance. The only thing I can see drawing a crowd is something going viral like the way UCLA gymnastics didWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:25
Do you mean regular seasons without Covid? That's crazy. When Sabrina was at Oregon, we actually out drew the MBB team by her senior year. I tried to get a ticket when my boss finally okayed a day off. They were sold out. And it wasn't against the top tier teams, so I was sure I could pick up a ticket. Nope.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:48
Another thing, stanford don't have fans lol. Maples probably only filled quarter max with most of them old people during game day.
Stanford is always an excellent team. Why wouldn't they be supported? Scratches my head.
To draw a crowd you need a dominant player. Stanford wbb doesn't have that.
Re: Women's College Basketball
That's not enough, even Katie Ledecky couldn't fill out the swimming arena. You take a really small student body plus a local population who are mostly out of state 1%ers. The sports culture just isn't there, especially with the students who are so used to being surrounded by Olympians. Stanford knows this in recruiting, they always get players who buy into the team and don't care about popularity and IG followers.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:55daGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:40Well it's hard to get the students to care about sports, they barely care about football. Plus they have too many sports where they're really good in so just being national champions won't get a crazy turnout. I'm a Stanford wbb fan by way of wvb and wsoc and they have even worse attendance. The only thing I can see drawing a crowd is something going viral like the way UCLA gymnastics didWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:25
Do you mean regular seasons without Covid? That's crazy. When Sabrina was at Oregon, we actually out drew the MBB team by her senior year. I tried to get a ticket when my boss finally okayed a day off. They were sold out. And it wasn't against the top tier teams, so I was sure I could pick up a ticket. Nope.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:48
Another thing, stanford don't have fans lol. Maples probably only filled quarter max with most of them old people during game day.
Stanford is always an excellent team. Why wouldn't they be supported? Scratches my head.
To draw a crowd you need a dominant player. Stanford wbb doesn't have that.
Re: Women's College Basketball
DA another Stanford Cardinal fan here, and I agree 100%. During the Andrew Luck era Stanford Stadium was being filled, but that's hard to come by. The women's volleyball program is the winningest wvb program ever & has won 3 out of the last 4 championships, yet their crowd pales in comparison to the Nebraska Cornhuskers, who are no slouches either, just not as successful. Despite having arguably the most successful athletics program in all of the NCAA, Stanford is first & foremost known for its academics & ties to Silicon Valley... Sports is meh... Being in the "Stanford Bubble" certainly doesn't help either since it can be quite isolating.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 08:02That's not enough, even Katie Ledecky couldn't fill out the swimming arena. You take a really small student body plus a local population who are mostly out of state 1%ers. The sports culture just isn't there, especially with the students who are so used to being surrounded by Olympians. Stanford knows this in recruiting, they always get players who buy into the team and don't care about popularity and IG followers.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:55daGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:40Well it's hard to get the students to care about sports, they barely care about football. Plus they have too many sports where they're really good in so just being national champions won't get a crazy turnout. I'm a Stanford wbb fan by way of wvb and wsoc and they have even worse attendance. The only thing I can see drawing a crowd is something going viral like the way UCLA gymnastics didWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:25![]()
Do you mean regular seasons without Covid? That's crazy. When Sabrina was at Oregon, we actually out drew the MBB team by her senior year. I tried to get a ticket when my boss finally okayed a day off. They were sold out. And it wasn't against the top tier teams, so I was sure I could pick up a ticket. Nope.
Stanford is always an excellent team. Why wouldn't they be supported? Scratches my head.
To draw a crowd you need a dominant player. Stanford wbb doesn't have that.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Ledecky brought crowds on swim meets outside stanford tho lol. I guess it's just apathetic bay area/california in generalGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 08:02That's not enough, even Katie Ledecky couldn't fill out the swimming arena. You take a really small student body plus a local population who are mostly out of state 1%ers. The sports culture just isn't there, especially with the students who are so used to being surrounded by Olympians. Stanford knows this in recruiting, they always get players who buy into the team and don't care about popularity and IG followers.Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:55daGuest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:40Well it's hard to get the students to care about sports, they barely care about football. Plus they have too many sports where they're really good in so just being national champions won't get a crazy turnout. I'm a Stanford wbb fan by way of wvb and wsoc and they have even worse attendance. The only thing I can see drawing a crowd is something going viral like the way UCLA gymnastics didWayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 06:25![]()
Do you mean regular seasons without Covid? That's crazy. When Sabrina was at Oregon, we actually out drew the MBB team by her senior year. I tried to get a ticket when my boss finally okayed a day off. They were sold out. And it wasn't against the top tier teams, so I was sure I could pick up a ticket. Nope.
Stanford is always an excellent team. Why wouldn't they be supported? Scratches my head.
To draw a crowd you need a dominant player. Stanford wbb doesn't have that.
Re: Women's College Basketball
I think it's actually a good thing for them being away from distractions, because even in pandemic college kids will find a way to throw parties at their dorms.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Like what? She's fam or nah?Guest wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 21:12What's the Arizona coach's story
Btw are the college bball players now lotta straighter or what?
Re: Women's College Basketball
Please tell me I'm not the only one who thinks Arizona's coach Adia Barnes is fine asf
Re: Women's College Basketball
You’re not, but she’s so straight married mom I can’t see anything more.Guest wrote: ↑06 Apr 2021, 01:40Please tell me I'm not the only one who thinks Arizona's coach Adia Barnes is fine asf
Re: Women's College Basketball
I know she's as straight as a line but when I was watching their games I just kept thinking damn she's fine
Re: Women's College Basketball
Alright, Tara and her Nerds will be back in the Final Four next year.
Re: Women's College Basketball
like getting a pg?Guest wrote: ↑06 Apr 2021, 14:09Alright, Tara and her Nerds will be back in the Final Four next year.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Not having the same old teams every year also probably help with the ratings
Re: Women's College Basketball
Hopefully, you’re right, and it doesn’t settle back into UConn and a few other contenders (SC, Baylor, etc). We thrive if parity and great players go multiple places. That’s what builds our sport and brings in new fans.
That is why I am such a big fan of Tara and her Stanford team, even though my heart is with my Ducks. For 30+ years, Stanford has been the WBB standard bearer out West. But our sport wasn’t doing very well in the PAC-12, overall. Who was the champion for bringing quality WBB into our Conference? Tara, even though it meant more competition to her team. Why? I suspect it’s because of her deep devotion and passion for our game.
With her strong support we began getting good coaches and players. First it was Scott Rueck and Oregon State. Then my Ducks went out and got Kelly Graves to leave Gonzaga. Now we have lots of excellent coaches in our Conference. Adia is just the latest. Until this year, Stanford wasn’t the best team in the Conference the past 3-4 years. They were no slouches. But they had stiff competition not just from Oregon, but from the Beavers, UCLA, both Arizona schools, and now Washington State is getting much better, too. There really was only one team not competitive this season. And they were hit so hard from injuries and Covid, that I felt good for them when they finally won a game. Arguably, my previously weak Conference, has become the strongest Conference in the country the last 2 years. Much of that credit goes to Tara, and I will be forever grateful she didn’t leave Stanford and head back East. Rumor had her thinking about a change around 2004/2005. Never confirmed, but plausible.
Great people build the Sport, not just their own team. Tara is a great person, IMO.
Re: Women's College Basketball
Shame Steph White was fired from Vanderbilt, but they were struggling badly each year. I hope she finds another spot at a lower conference.
Re: Women's College Basketball
She's straight right?Guest wrote: ↑06 Apr 2021, 20:47aari mcdonald is so cute
Re: Women's College Basketball
Well said. Tara has had some really bad luck over the years to not win a championship since 92 and a lot of people rate the pac12 by natties won despite having 6(?) programs in the last decade reach the final four.Wayhaughtshipper18 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2021, 00:44Hopefully, you’re right, and it doesn’t settle back into UConn and a few other contenders (SC, Baylor, etc). We thrive if parity and great players go multiple places. That’s what builds our sport and brings in new fans.
That is why I am such a big fan of Tara and her Stanford team, even though my heart is with my Ducks. For 30+ years, Stanford has been the WBB standard bearer out West. But our sport wasn’t doing very well in the PAC-12, overall. Who was the champion for bringing quality WBB into our Conference? Tara, even though it meant more competition to her team. Why? I suspect it’s because of her deep devotion and passion for our game.
With her strong support we began getting good coaches and players. First it was Scott Rueck and Oregon State. Then my Ducks went out and got Kelly Graves to leave Gonzaga. Now we have lots of excellent coaches in our Conference. Adia is just the latest. Until this year, Stanford wasn’t the best team in the Conference the past 3-4 years. They were no slouches. But they had stiff competition not just from Oregon, but from the Beavers, UCLA, both Arizona schools, and now Washington State is getting much better, too. There really was only one team not competitive this season. And they were hit so hard from injuries and Covid, that I felt good for them when they finally won a game. Arguably, my previously weak Conference, has become the strongest Conference in the country the last 2 years. Much of that credit goes to Tara, and I will be forever grateful she didn’t leave Stanford and head back East. Rumor had her thinking about a change around 2004/2005. Never confirmed, but plausible.
Great people build the Sport, not just their own team. Tara is a great person, IMO.
She doesn’t just champion the sport but her coaching tree is insane and most of them stay in the west. I always appreciated how she only took female assistant coaches her entire career. Especially as a fan of volleyball where there hasn’t been a single female head coach to win a nattie.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 185 guests