The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

Post Reply
Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17351

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Apr 2023, 11:32
You better let me what the heck is going on with Muguruza‘s head and I cannot believe she could actually wear an engagement ring and even considering to marry this jobless toy boy rumoured gay that just got divorced in 2021… whooooa.

You're back, Mugu nuts. Complaints about Mugu and her fashion director Toy Boy. No one cares if she is gay or not.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17352

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 May 2023, 03:48
Am I back? Ekhm ok. Im afraid the only nuts person is you… and talking about anything else than politics and Iga is kinda refreshing
Guest wrote:
01 May 2023, 00:24
Guest wrote:
30 Apr 2023, 11:32
You better let me what the heck is going on with Muguruza‘s head and I cannot believe she could actually wear an engagement ring and even considering to marry this jobless toy boy rumoured gay that just got divorced in 2021… whooooa.

You're back, Mugu nuts. Complaints about Mugu and her fashion director Toy Boy. No one cares if she is gay or not.
Not care about them, get a thread for Mugu and her toy boy.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17353

Post by Guest »

Never seen a combined tournament where the spectators care so little for the women's matches.

The boxes are always empty on the main court.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17354

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 11:11
Never seen a combined tournament where the spectators care so little for the women's matches.

The boxes are always empty on the main court.
The owner of Madrid is a male chauvinist. A rich Romanian who lives in Madrid.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17355

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Apr 2023, 11:32
You better let me what the heck is going on with Muguruza‘s head and I cannot believe she could actually wear an engagement ring and even considering to marry this jobless toy boy rumoured gay that just got divorced in 2021… whooooa.

She's just a straight woman. You should accept it.


Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17357

Post by Guest »

whoa! . basically as good as 20 odd months off given the all the results since that USO.

hope she is able to come back

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17358

Post by Guest »

looks and English speaking. which is why Maria Sharapova at one point was the highest earner even though the Williams sisters had more Slams.

this is also true for just about any sports and is not unique to WTA. looks and English speaking will more than make up even if the sports talent has lesser talent compared to others.

yeah, it is unfair to Iga, but that's the way marketing works unfortunately.

[/quote]
Players like Emma get the big sponsors because of their looks. That type of money just isn't available to players who are perceived as less physically attractive. Those are the real facts of the business side of tennis. DA
[/quote]

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17359

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 17:14
looks and English speaking. which is why Maria Sharapova at one point was the highest earner even though the Williams sisters had more Slams.

this is also true for just about any sports and is not unique to WTA. looks and English speaking will more than make up even if the sports talent has lesser talent compared to others.

yeah, it is unfair to Iga, but that's the way marketing works unfortunately.
Players like Emma get the big sponsors because of their looks. That type of money just isn't available to players who are perceived as less physically attractive. Those are the real facts of the business side of tennis. DA
[/quote]
[/quote]

Athletics is not a beauty pageant. While Emma has a Grand Slam in her hands, she is guaranteed to be rich for life. Ultimately, athletic achievement determines everything. Sponsors don't spoil anyone all the time.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17360

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 15:54
She is a strong girl, not just injuries that she has to deal with, the criticism, the insults too, all year.
So it's a serious injury but I'm optimistic that she will be okay and come back again. The good news is young body can heal faster. Get well soon, Emma.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17361

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 23:10
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 17:14
looks and English speaking. which is why Maria Sharapova at one point was the highest earner even though the Williams sisters had more Slams.

this is also true for just about any sports and is not unique to WTA. looks and English speaking will more than make up even if the sports talent has lesser talent compared to others.

yeah, it is unfair to Iga, but that's the way marketing works unfortunately.
Players like Emma get the big sponsors because of their looks. That type of money just isn't available to players who are perceived as less physically attractive. Those are the real facts of the business side of tennis. DA
[/quote]

Athletics is not a beauty pageant. While Emma has a Grand Slam in her hands, she is guaranteed to be rich for life. Ultimately, athletic achievement determines everything. Sponsors don't spoil anyone all the time.
[/quote]

you really believe that tosh? Krejcikova also has won one slam. her career prize money is $10m.

Raducanu has one slam as well. her career prize money is $3.7m, which is already more than 1/3rd of Krejcikova's and Barbora has more titles than her.

Looks and English DO matter. Your not believing it does not change it.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17362

Post by Guest »

Sabalenka and Sakkari ping a lot. .
Fernandez missed Wimbledon last year due to Injury. You couldn't make it up!!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17363

Post by Guest »

Surely you don't get more prize money due to looks and English speaking!!
Isn't it more that each tournament pays very differently?
And Emma winning US was bigger than say French open money, ?
I can't believe Stefanos Tsitsipas has 25 million prize money when it's mainly been smaller tournaments.
Maybe I heard prizes have gone up loads in last 5 years.
You only need to get to round 3 in slams for some years to be a multi millionaire these days!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17364

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 09:39
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 23:10
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 17:14
looks and English speaking. which is why Maria Sharapova at one point was the highest earner even though the Williams sisters had more Slams.

this is also true for just about any sports and is not unique to WTA. looks and English speaking will more than make up even if the sports talent has lesser talent compared to others.

yeah, it is unfair to Iga, but that's the way marketing works unfortunately.
Players like Emma get the big sponsors because of their looks. That type of money just isn't available to players who are perceived as less physically attractive. Those are the real facts of the business side of tennis. DA
Athletics is not a beauty pageant. While Emma has a Grand Slam in her hands, she is guaranteed to be rich for life. Ultimately, athletic achievement determines everything. Sponsors don't spoil anyone all the time.
[/quote]

you really believe that tosh? Krejcikova also has won one slam. her career prize money is $10m.

Raducanu has one slam as well. her career prize money is $3.7m, which is already more than 1/3rd of Krejcikova's and Barbora has more titles than her.

Looks and English DO matter. Your not believing it does not change it.
[/quote]

I have never denied the importance of English hegemony and being the queen of topics. As I said, even if Emma doesn't play any more, people will still remember she is the champion of USO 2021. She's guaranteed to be rich for her life with her sponsers. What I'm trying to say is that in the world of competitive sports, it's all about achievements, or titles. Our market in China is open to everyone, but that doesn't mean Emma will make money from it. Even Eileen Gu, who is the most talked about in China, is not making money as easily as she did before and after the Winter Olympics. We are not stupid. The most talked about tennis players in China right now are Zheng Qinwen, Zhang Zhizhen and Wu YiBin, and any one of them winning the title could easily take away Emma's market. They're already doing it.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17365

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 22:47
Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 09:39
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 23:10
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 17:14
looks and English speaking. which is why Maria Sharapova at one point was the highest earner even though the Williams sisters had more Slams.

this is also true for just about any sports and is not unique to WTA. looks and English speaking will more than make up even if the sports talent has lesser talent compared to others.

yeah, it is unfair to Iga, but that's the way marketing works unfortunately.
Players like Emma get the big sponsors because of their looks. That type of money just isn't available to players who are perceived as less physically attractive. Those are the real facts of the business side of tennis. DA
Athletics is not a beauty pageant. While Emma has a Grand Slam in her hands, she is guaranteed to be rich for life. Ultimately, athletic achievement determines everything. Sponsors don't spoil anyone all the time.
you really believe that tosh? Krejcikova also has won one slam. her career prize money is $10m.

Raducanu has one slam as well. her career prize money is $3.7m, which is already more than 1/3rd of Krejcikova's and Barbora has more titles than her.

Looks and English DO matter. Your not believing it does not change it.
[/quote]

I have never denied the importance of English hegemony and being the queen of topics. As I said, even if Emma doesn't play any more, people will still remember she is the champion of USO 2021. She's guaranteed to be rich for her life with her sponsers. What I'm trying to say is that in the world of competitive sports, it's all about achievements, or titles. Our market in China is open to everyone, but that doesn't mean Emma will make money from it. Even Eileen Gu, who is the most talked about in China, is not making money as easily as she did before and after the Winter Olympics. We are not stupid. The most talked about tennis players in China right now are Zheng Qinwen, Zhang Zhizhen and Wu YiBin, and any one of them winning the title could easily take away Emma's market. They're already doing it.
[/quote]

Emma has both sides of market east and west, similar to Naomi. She might not as popular as their own Chinese athletes like Li Na or Qinwen but I'm sure there is a place for her in China market, the big one, of course she has to win more titles too
but she is still the only one who won a slam recently being half Chinese.
Qinwen is not there yet. I'm cheering for both of them to be successful on both popularity and winning the titles.
It will be great for the tour overall. DA

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17366

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
05 May 2023, 07:10
Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 22:47
Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 09:39
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 23:10
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 17:14
looks and English speaking. which is why Maria Sharapova at one point was the highest earner even though the Williams sisters had more Slams.

this is also true for just about any sports and is not unique to WTA. looks and English speaking will more than make up even if the sports talent has lesser talent compared to others.

yeah, it is unfair to Iga, but that's the way marketing works unfortunately.
Players like Emma get the big sponsors because of their looks. That type of money just isn't available to players who are perceived as less physically attractive. Those are the real facts of the business side of tennis. DA
Athletics is not a beauty pageant. While Emma has a Grand Slam in her hands, she is guaranteed to be rich for life. Ultimately, athletic achievement determines everything. Sponsors don't spoil anyone all the time.
you really believe that tosh? Krejcikova also has won one slam. her career prize money is $10m.

Raducanu has one slam as well. her career prize money is $3.7m, which is already more than 1/3rd of Krejcikova's and Barbora has more titles than her.

Looks and English DO matter. Your not believing it does not change it.
I have never denied the importance of English hegemony and being the queen of topics. As I said, even if Emma doesn't play any more, people will still remember she is the champion of USO 2021. She's guaranteed to be rich for her life with her sponsers. What I'm trying to say is that in the world of competitive sports, it's all about achievements, or titles. Our market in China is open to everyone, but that doesn't mean Emma will make money from it. Even Eileen Gu, who is the most talked about in China, is not making money as easily as she did before and after the Winter Olympics. We are not stupid. The most talked about tennis players in China right now are Zheng Qinwen, Zhang Zhizhen and Wu YiBin, and any one of them winning the title could easily take away Emma's market. They're already doing it.
[/quote]

Emma has both sides of market east and west, similar to Naomi. She might not as popular as their own Chinese athletes like Li Na or Qinwen but I'm sure there is a place for her in China market, the big one, of course she has to win more titles too
but she is still the only one who won a slam recently being half Chinese.
Qinwen is not there yet. I'm cheering for both of them to be successful on both popularity and winning the titles.
It will be great for the tour overall. DA
[/quote]

Sure she will. Our market is too big. We don't mind foreigners coming to China to make money. People with diverse backgrounds such as Eileen, Emma, and Naomi, if they have no achievements in their sports, they can still make big money in China by relying on discussions. To be honest, we lack world-class influencers such as football, tennis, basketball stars... We only have table tennis and badminton, but the athletes there do not have international influence. And many of them have promiscuous private lives. Not everyone can make money in China, from politicians to ordinary people, we have "zero tolerance" for gambling, pornography, drugs.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17367

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
05 May 2023, 10:10
Guest wrote:
05 May 2023, 07:10
Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 22:47
Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 09:39
Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 23:10

Players like Emma get the big sponsors because of their looks. That type of money just isn't available to players who are perceived as less physically attractive. Those are the real facts of the business side of tennis. DA
Athletics is not a beauty pageant. While Emma has a Grand Slam in her hands, she is guaranteed to be rich for life. Ultimately, athletic achievement determines everything. Sponsors don't spoil anyone all the time.
you really believe that tosh? Krejcikova also has won one slam. her career prize money is $10m.

Raducanu has one slam as well. her career prize money is $3.7m, which is already more than 1/3rd of Krejcikova's and Barbora has more titles than her.

Looks and English DO matter. Your not believing it does not change it.
I have never denied the importance of English hegemony and being the queen of topics. As I said, even if Emma doesn't play any more, people will still remember she is the champion of USO 2021. She's guaranteed to be rich for her life with her sponsers. What I'm trying to say is that in the world of competitive sports, it's all about achievements, or titles. Our market in China is open to everyone, but that doesn't mean Emma will make money from it. Even Eileen Gu, who is the most talked about in China, is not making money as easily as she did before and after the Winter Olympics. We are not stupid. The most talked about tennis players in China right now are Zheng Qinwen, Zhang Zhizhen and Wu YiBin, and any one of them winning the title could easily take away Emma's market. They're already doing it.
Emma has both sides of market east and west, similar to Naomi. She might not as popular as their own Chinese athletes like Li Na or Qinwen but I'm sure there is a place for her in China market, the big one, of course she has to win more titles too
but she is still the only one who won a slam recently being half Chinese.
Qinwen is not there yet. I'm cheering for both of them to be successful on both popularity and winning the titles.
It will be great for the tour overall. DA
[/quote]

Sure she will. Our market is too big. We don't mind foreigners coming to China to make money. People with diverse backgrounds such as Eileen, Emma, and Naomi, if they have no achievements in their sports, they can still make big money in China by relying on discussions. To be honest, we lack world-class influencers such as football, tennis, basketball stars... We only have table tennis and badminton, but the athletes there do not have international influence. And many of them have promiscuous private lives. Not everyone can make money in China, from politicians to ordinary people, we have "zero tolerance" for gambling, pornography, drugs.
[/quote]

you live in such a great country. the whole world should bow to China. everything is perfect. even those Uyghurs should bow to China

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17368

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
05 May 2023, 14:03
Guest wrote:
05 May 2023, 10:10
Guest wrote:
05 May 2023, 07:10
Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 22:47
Guest wrote:
04 May 2023, 09:39
Athletics is not a beauty pageant. While Emma has a Grand Slam in her hands, she is guaranteed to be rich for life. Ultimately, athletic achievement determines everything. Sponsors don't spoil anyone all the time.
you really believe that tosh? Krejcikova also has won one slam. her career prize money is $10m.

Raducanu has one slam as well. her career prize money is $3.7m, which is already more than 1/3rd of Krejcikova's and Barbora has more titles than her.

Looks and English DO matter. Your not believing it does not change it.
I have never denied the importance of English hegemony and being the queen of topics. As I said, even if Emma doesn't play any more, people will still remember she is the champion of USO 2021. She's guaranteed to be rich for her life with her sponsers. What I'm trying to say is that in the world of competitive sports, it's all about achievements, or titles. Our market in China is open to everyone, but that doesn't mean Emma will make money from it. Even Eileen Gu, who is the most talked about in China, is not making money as easily as she did before and after the Winter Olympics. We are not stupid. The most talked about tennis players in China right now are Zheng Qinwen, Zhang Zhizhen and Wu YiBin, and any one of them winning the title could easily take away Emma's market. They're already doing it.
Emma has both sides of market east and west, similar to Naomi. She might not as popular as their own Chinese athletes like Li Na or Qinwen but I'm sure there is a place for her in China market, the big one, of course she has to win more titles too
but she is still the only one who won a slam recently being half Chinese.
Qinwen is not there yet. I'm cheering for both of them to be successful on both popularity and winning the titles.
It will be great for the tour overall. DA
Sure she will. Our market is too big. We don't mind foreigners coming to China to make money. People with diverse backgrounds such as Eileen, Emma, and Naomi, if they have no achievements in their sports, they can still make big money in China by relying on discussions. To be honest, we lack world-class influencers such as football, tennis, basketball stars... We only have table tennis and badminton, but the athletes there do not have international influence. And many of them have promiscuous private lives. Not everyone can make money in China, from politicians to ordinary people, we have "zero tolerance" for gambling, pornography, drugs.
[/quote]

you live in such a great country. the whole world should bow to China. everything is perfect. even those Uyghurs should bow to China
[/quote]

No. My country is not great. We all live in the real world. You can't say anything else besides fake news about Uyghurs. Some Uyghurs who believe in extreme religions have committed multiple terrorist cases in Xinjiang, killing a large number of Chinese. Of course you don't believe it because BBC never reports on these. You may not even be able to afford a flight ticket to China. The pariah of China bow to the noble white elites of the Western world. :dance2:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17369

Post by Guest »

Amanda takes a break from tennis. Last year was great for her but she already burnout, damn. Taking a break is indeed a good thing if she doesn't want to be on the tennis court. Take your time and come back fresh, girl.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17370

Post by Guest »

Aryna is peaking isn't she? At the age of 29, another example of late bloomer. All the experiences over the years paying her off now. I first saw her playing Fed Cup years ago and thought this headcase was going nowhere but look at where she is now. Beating no.1 twice for her Madrid titles, won a slam and being number one on the race.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17371

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
07 May 2023, 09:46
Aryna is peaking isn't she? At the age of 29, another example of late bloomer. All the experiences over the years paying her off now. I first saw her playing Fed Cup years ago and thought this headcase was going nowhere but look at where she is now. Beating no.1 twice for her Madrid titles, won a slam and being number one on the race.
Age of 25, sorry.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17372

Post by Guest »

The organization in Madrid is terrible. F Lopez should get his ass out immediately. I have never seen such a shameless tour organization. The birthday cake for Sabalenka was very careless. Now, even in the final of women's doubles, players are not scheduled to give speeches. Ironically, the speeches for men's doubles and men's singles finals have not been cancelled. And the clothes worn by all female ball kids in men's matches are full of insults to women. Madrid, the worst WTA tour. :argh:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17373

Post by Guest »

If the organizers in Madrid look down on women's tennis so much, just cancel WTA in Madrid. WTA can choose other cities. :argh:

Tennnisfan
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17374

Post by Tennnisfan »

Guest wrote:
07 May 2023, 09:20
Amanda takes a break from tennis. Last year was great for her but she already burnout, damn. Taking a break is indeed a good thing if she doesn't want to be on the tennis court. Take your time and come back fresh, girl.
Wishing her the best and hopefully soon she is back. Love watching her when she's on. Any chance she is?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17375

Post by Guest »

So, there won't be any tennis players in Laureus Awards tonight.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17376

Post by Guest »

I see Riley Gaines has started calling on female athletes past and present to speak up.for womens sport and fairness. She first called on the William's sisters but so far they have remained silent. Gaines questions whether they are afraid of cancel culture

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17377

Post by Guest »

They should ask everyone

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17378

Post by Guest »

Lol that the only notable match Kenin's won in ages might block Sabalenka's path to #1

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17379

Post by Guest »

Did not have Penko bageling Krejcikova on my prediction sheet, hot damn

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17380

Post by Guest »

so so sad to see legends go

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17381

Post by Guest »

Another 1000 title for Lena, this time it's on clay. :queen: :goldstar:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17382

Post by Guest »

What do you think about Rybakina? :$
I get some vibes from her, but maybe because I have a crush :spy: :P

guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17383

Post by guest »

Guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 12:59
What do you think about Rybakina? :$
I get some vibes from her, but maybe because I have a crush :spy: :P
She is nice, classy, calm, and a strong tennis player, but also strong straight I guess :lol:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17384

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 12:59
What do you think about Rybakina? :$
I get some vibes from her, but maybe because I have a crush :spy: :P
I'm the same when it comes to Rybakina.Badosa too.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17385

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 19:41
Guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 12:59
What do you think about Rybakina? :$
I get some vibes from her, but maybe because I have a crush :spy: :P
I'm the same when it comes to Rybakina.Badosa too.
Badosa is beautiful too but she doesn’t ping to me.
I see Elena Ryb. different…I don’t how to explain,maybe the way she moves/walks

But I was the one shocked to know Kalinina is married to a MAN , so maybe my gaydar is not so perfect :bigcry:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17386

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 May 2023, 11:03
Guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 19:41
Guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 12:59
What do you think about Rybakina? :$
I get some vibes from her, but maybe because I have a crush :spy: :P
I'm the same when it comes to Rybakina.Badosa too.
Badosa is beautiful too but she doesn’t ping to me.
I see Elena Ryb. different…I don’t how to explain,maybe the way she moves/walks

But I was the one shocked to know Kalinina is married to a MAN , so maybe my gaydar is not so perfect :bigcry:
Haha, same! It was quite the surprise for me when the commentators mentioned that her coach is also her husband.

But then again Emma also pings to me but she just posted a picutre with a guy and apparently they have been dating for some months.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17387

Post by Guest »

guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 16:27
Guest wrote:
21 May 2023, 12:59
What do you think about Rybakina? :$
I get some vibes from her, but maybe because I have a crush :spy: :P
She is nice, classy, calm, and a strong tennis player, but also strong straight I guess :lol:
:sadangel: :bigcry:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17388

Post by Guest »

Which player/s do you like but lots of other fans seem to dislike?

Also,which player/s have you not warmed to but other fans seem to like?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17389

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
03 May 2023, 15:54
yep, and now she's planning a wedding to marry him

https://euro.eseuro.com/sports/404450.html

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17390

Post by Guest »

my bad i replied to the wrong post but garbine is getting married


Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17392

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 May 2023, 11:47
Muguruza is getting married

https://www.hola.com/actualidad/2023052 ... 1684909020
Where's the mugu nuts? Mugu is marrying her toy boy.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17393

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 May 2023, 11:47
Muguruza is getting married

https://www.hola.com/actualidad/2023052 ... 1684909020
Wow that MEET UP in central park story seems like something totally made up :spy:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17394

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 May 2023, 19:46
Guest wrote:
24 May 2023, 11:47
Muguruza is getting married

https://www.hola.com/actualidad/2023052 ... 1684909020
Wow that MEET UP in central park story seems like something totally made up :spy:
so happy for mugu's engagement! the amount of desperation on this thread for garbine to be gay was revolting :rofl:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17395

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 May 2023, 19:19
Which player/s do you like but lots of other fans seem to dislike?

Also,which player/s have you not warmed to but other fans seem to like?
Sabalenka I guess. I'm a big fan but a lot of fans find her hard to warm to. Maybe I'm wrong.
I can't really warm to Alcaraz and the hype is driving me nuts and making me dislike him. He's a great player for sure, and seems like a nice guy, but media talk about him like he's the big 3 rolled into one.

Mugu wtf is with that story :lol: It's like something from a romcom. Good on her though if she's happy.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17396

Post by Guest »

Mugu wtf is with that story :lol: It's like something from a romcom. Good on her though if she's happy.
[/quote]

Exactly hahaha! Looks like her management go a little bit too „loco” polishing it :rofl:
This guy is a gold digger tho…

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17397

Post by Guest »

Paula Badosa out of Roland Garros/French Open.Gutted.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17398

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 May 2023, 09:48
Paula Badosa out of Roland Garros/French Open.Gutted.
Apparently the recovery time is 8-12 weeks so Wimbledon is off the table as well.
Let‘s hope she will be ready for the north american hard court season.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17399

Post by Guest »

Is anybody on this thread interested in Roland Garros this year? Weird to see almost 2 days of play complete and no posts. The tennis thread just hasn't been quite the same since L Chat came back. Thoughts?

I have enjoyed Roland Garros thus far.Sabalenka played pretty well yesterday. I was happy for Stephens to get a win today. There were also wins for the likes of Garcia,Vekic,Osorio and Vondrousova.I am personally cheering for Garcia and Rybakina since my fave Badosa is out with an injury. Hoping Jabeur will do well too.

Dragonfish
Member
Reactions: 87
Posts: 352
Joined: 08 Jun 2020, 07:15

Re: The Official Tennis Thread - Part II

#17400

Post by Dragonfish »

Guest wrote:
29 May 2023, 18:17
Is anybody on this thread interested in Roland Garros this year? Weird to see almost 2 days of play complete and no posts. The tennis thread just hasn't been quite the same since L Chat came back. Thoughts?

I have enjoyed Roland Garros thus far.Sabalenka played pretty well yesterday. I was happy for Stephens to get a win today. There were also wins for the likes of Garcia,Vekic,Osorio and Vondrousova.I am personally cheering for Garcia and Rybakina since my fave Badosa is out with an injury. Hoping Jabeur will do well too.
Ons has been my favourite since Barty retired so I’m hoping she will do well 😊

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Past022 and 461 guests