WNBA - Part III

by **Guest** » 11 minutes ago

Chicago is back.

by **Guest** » 22 minutes ago

Chicago is sucking.

by **Guest** » 28 minutes ago

It's looking like the Sun is gonna win again.

by **Guest** » 33 minutes ago

31-15

by **Guest** » 42 minutes ago

Liberty could take a nap and still win this game.

by **Guest** » 45 minutes ago

*waiting patiently for the Sun to lose*

by **Guest** » 51 minutes ago

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 23:32
Anybody Watching sky and liberty tonight.

by **Guest** » 54 minutes ago

Winless team leading unbeaten team at halftime?

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 23:32

Anybody Watching sky and liberty tonight.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 22:24

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 22:02

The Angel Reese effect?

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 20:53

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 18:38

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 18:12

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 16:08

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 15:09
Who are 'these' players exactly? Name me some names who are 'targeting her' other than Carter who has been a known psycho since forever
I don't know why Carter is even back in the WNBA. I don't think she has mature one bit and having a coach that backs your behavior definitely won't help.

CC is being guarded more aggressively but I don't think she's being targeted. The goal is to win a game, so of course to win you have to stop your opponent's best player and that happened to be CC. I think as she get used to the WNBA, she'll find a way around this.
Yeah she is 100% being guarded more aggressively than other rookie, but if anything that’s a compliment to her and how good they know she can be lol I’m not sure how people are considering that “targeting”

Teams are also being more physical with her because they know that’s the best way to knock her off her game right now. She already said one goal this offseason is to put on more muscle because of it.
da
It's semantics. If every team goes after one player harder than any other, is that considered "targeting"?

All the hard bumps/fouls/non-fouls take their toll. They're slowly killing their golden goose.

DA

Exactly right. I don't think this is what people are tuning in for, and if it's what we continually see people will tune out.

If someone did that to Steph Curry it would be a suspension. The NBA is smart enough to know this kind of shit doesn't sell tickets, and it doesn't benefit them in anyway to see their star players targeted this way.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 20:23

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 19:58

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 19:44

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 18:38

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 18:12

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 16:08

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 15:09
Who are 'these' players exactly? Name me some names who are 'targeting her' other than Carter who has been a known psycho since forever
I don't know why Carter is even back in the WNBA. I don't think she has mature one bit and having a coach that backs your behavior definitely won't help.

CC is being guarded more aggressively but I don't think she's being targeted. The goal is to win a game, so of course to win you have to stop your opponent's best player and that happened to be CC. I think as she get used to the WNBA, she'll find a way around this.
Yeah she is 100% being guarded more aggressively than other rookie, but if anything that’s a compliment to her and how good they know she can be lol I’m not sure how people are considering that “targeting”

Teams are also being more physical with her because they know that’s the best way to knock her off her game right now. She already said one goal this offseason is to put on more muscle because of it.

da
It's semantics. If every team goes after one player harder than any other, is that considered "targeting"?

All the hard bumps/fouls/non-fouls take their toll. They're slowly killing their golden goose.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 18:12

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 16:08

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 15:09
Who are 'these' players exactly? Name me some names who are 'targeting her' other than Carter who has been a known psycho since forever
I don't know why Carter is even back in the WNBA. I don't think she has mature one bit and having a coach that backs your behavior definitely won't help.

CC is being guarded more aggressively but I don't think she's being targeted. The goal is to win a game, so of course to win you have to stop your opponent's best player and that happened to be CC. I think as she get used to the WNBA, she'll find a way around this.

Yeah she is 100% being guarded more aggressively than other rookie, but if anything that’s a compliment to her and how good they know she can be lol I’m not sure how people are considering that “targeting”

Teams are also being more physical with her because they know that’s the best way to knock her off her game right now. She already said one goal this offseason is to put on more muscle because of it.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 18:01

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 17:51

It's all about putting Clark in her place. We'll probably never know for sure if it's an age thing (vets vs rookie) or money/attention thing (Clark getting more than she "deserves") or a race/orientation thing.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 16:08

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 15:09
Who are 'these' players exactly? Name me some names who are 'targeting her' other than Carter who has been a known psycho since forever

I don't know why Carter is even back in the WNBA. I don't think she has mature one bit and having a coach that backs your behavior definitely won't help.

CC is being guarded more aggressively but I don't think she's being targeted. The goal is to win a game, so of course to win you have to stop your opponent's best player and that happened to be CC. I think as she get used to the WNBA, she'll find a way around this.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 15:09

Who are 'these' players exactly? Name me some names who are 'targeting her' other than Carter who has been a known psycho since forever

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 15:02

Why these players can't just admit that yes they're targeting her? Like it's pretty obvious now. People will stop watching if this shit keep going on. I predict the ratings will drop after olympic break.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 14:48

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 14:27

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 13:38

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 13:01
CC has to disappear for a few months.
I already said she needs to drop WNBA and just play in europe. Those petty bishes won't stop until she got serious injury.
They won't guard her in Europe? Can you just admit Cc didn't preform up to the high expectations. Wnba players are great at their job?

Again, the expectations being placed on her by her own fans and media have done her a huge disservice because anything under 30 points a game is her “underperforming.” Thinkpieces about her being a bust for her 10 TO game, but crickets about Arike, an all star, doing the same thing 2 days ago.

The numbers she’s put up would be excellent for any other rookie PG on a terrible team with their first 11 games in 20 days. But since people deemed her the “savior” of the league, she’s being labeled as underperforming.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 14:34

The gaslighting already started yall

"minor bump"

"They won't guard her in Europe?"

It's the same shit. They won't acknowledge the problem. Just pretend it doesnt exist.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 14:27

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 13:38

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 13:01
CC has to disappear for a few months.
I already said she needs to drop WNBA and just play in europe. Those petty bishes won't stop until she got serious injury.

They won't guard her in Europe? Can you just admit Cc didn't preform up to the high expectations. Wnba players are great at their job?

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 14:20

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 14:11
LMAO still people with the pretend outrage over a minor bump

They are so ridiculous. I for one won't watch anymore fever games. I will support every other team.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 14:11

LMAO still people with the pretend outrage over a minor bump

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 13:38

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 13:01
CC has to disappear for a few months.

I already said she needs to drop WNBA and just play in europe. Those petty bishes won't stop until she got serious injury.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 13:01

CC has to disappear for a few months.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 12:45

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 12:17
Read the comments on that ESPN videos lmao no one believe any of their "false narrative!!111" spin

People will be tired with this bs and will stop watching

Gatekeeping fans can get their irrelevant WNBA back

I forgot you people shouldn't work for anything. Slaves should work for you. Gtfo

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 12:34

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 11:25

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 05:37

FoolishGrey wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 03:35

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 03:29

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 02:51

1717469516]
Not CC already 2nd in assist lmao
4th if you look at it per game instead of totals but still very impressive for a rookie who is supposedly having such a disappointing start to her career
It would be so much more if her teammates could actually make their open shots and layups. It's pretty impressive
That's a great point. Her assists would be way higher if she had half decent teammates.
That’s what I meant earlier when I said it would be interesting if Clark made the Olympic team to see what would happen if she had teammates that could catch better, shoot better, and set screens better (or at all). Clark might still have some shooting issues or some TOs but I think she’d excel in passing and facilitating plays.

The expectations on her have been so insanely high that they’re overshadowing what really isn’t a horrible start to her career. Definitely needs to get her shot back and work on the TOs though.

A rookie getting guarded like she does, with one of the highest usage rates in the league already, on a bad team with the toughest opening schedule, there is a lot on her shoulders before you even account for all of this off the court stuff.

Still hope she doesn’t make the Olympics though. The rest will be more beneficial to her than anything, she wouldn’t get many minutes in Paris anyways.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 12:22

Wnba players( all black players) next time you play the fever don't guard CC. When she has the ball turn your back.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 12:17

Read the comments on that ESPN videos lmao no one believe any of their "false narrative!!111" spin

People will be tired with this bs and will stop watching

Gatekeeping fans can get their irrelevant WNBA back

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 11:25

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 05:37

FoolishGrey wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 03:35

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 03:29

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 02:51

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 23:53

1717469516]
Not CC already 2nd in assist lmao
4th if you look at it per game instead of totals but still very impressive for a rookie who is supposedly having such a disappointing start to her career
It would be so much more if her teammates could actually make their open shots and layups. It's pretty impressive
That's a great point. Her assists would be way higher if she had half decent teammates.

That’s what I meant earlier when I said it would be interesting if Clark made the Olympic team to see what would happen if she had teammates that could catch better, shoot better, and set screens better (or at all). Clark might still have some shooting issues or some TOs but I think she’d excel in passing and facilitating plays.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 11:24

They told her the wnba would be different. It's way easier when no one gaurds you in college. Now players are playing her . Don't let average think they're great.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 11:17

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 07:10

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 20:53
WNBA media have their heads in the sand.

Truly pathetic.

ESPN Host & Talking head: It's a dangerous, false narrative to suggest CC is being targeted and other players are jealous.

Angel Reese: Announces in press CC shouldn't get so much attn, and she herself deserves more praise. Also jumps up to applaud teammate who cheap shotted CC.

Reese jumping up and praising Carter was so stupid on her part. That’s just putting yourself in a lose/lose situation by inserting yourself into what everyone knew would be a shit storm and adding to a negative situation. She wants to play both the villain and the victim.

She sure enough didn’t do that in the LSU/SC scuffle. She took one look at what was going on and sat her ass down while her teammates ran off the bench to either join in the fray if need be or help break things up. Which Reese taking herself out of the situation was the right call.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 11:09

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 06:58

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 06:40
Lol some people still trying to deny it.

"no those innocent players never targeted cc"

What a joke. And bunch of copes. People have eyes.
yeah the gas lighting pretending this isn't happening makes it all the more real and concerning.

WNBA has lightning in a bottle handed to them on a silver platter, and this is what they choose to do with it. Makes everyone involved look weak, TBH.

The more ESPN and WNBA trying to spin it as "fALsE NArraTiVe" the more people will see through the lies

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 11:06

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 07:44

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 07:10

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 20:53
WNBA media have their heads in the sand.

Truly pathetic.

ESPN Host & Talking head: It's a dangerous, false narrative to suggest CC is being targeted and other players are jealous.

Angel Reese: Announces in press CC shouldn't get so much attn, and she herself deserves more praise. Also jumps up to applaud teammate who cheap shotted CC.
what is truly pathetic is your stupidity + lack of comprehension when hearing + reading comments but please stay going off since you enjoy sounding dumb in front of the class

DA you clearly don't have any other arguments. People have eyes and brains. You and WNBA can deny however you want but the reality have already been seen by the public.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 07:44

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 07:10

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 20:53
WNBA media have their heads in the sand.

Truly pathetic.

ESPN Host & Talking head: It's a dangerous, false narrative to suggest CC is being targeted and other players are jealous.

Angel Reese: Announces in press CC shouldn't get so much attn, and she herself deserves more praise. Also jumps up to applaud teammate who cheap shotted CC.

what is truly pathetic is your stupidity + lack of comprehension when hearing + reading comments but please stay going off since you enjoy sounding dumb in front of the class

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 07:10

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 20:53
WNBA media have their heads in the sand.

Truly pathetic.

ESPN Host & Talking head: It's a dangerous, false narrative to suggest CC is being targeted and other players are jealous.

Angel Reese: Announces in press CC shouldn't get so much attn, and she herself deserves more praise. Also jumps up to applaud teammate who cheap shotted CC.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 06:58

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 06:40
Lol some people still trying to deny it.

"no those innocent players never targeted cc"

What a joke. And bunch of copes. People have eyes.

yeah the gas lighting pretending this isn't happening makes it all the more real and concerning.

WNBA has lightning in a bottle handed to them on a silver platter, and this is what they choose to do with it. Makes everyone involved look weak, TBH.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 06:51

I know it doesn't really matter but why are some people saying it was a "hip check" when Carter clearly hit Clark with her shoulder? idgi

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 06:40

Lol some people still trying to deny it.

"no those innocent players never targeted cc"

What a joke. And bunch of copes. People have eyes.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 05:55

I don't think the wnba is going after CC. Her fans expected her to come in a never miss a shot. That's crazy ,she's a rookie. Just last week they were racist towards Ali Boston. The foul by the Chicago player was dirty play yes.
We all didn't start to watch wnba because of Clark. I personally got league pass to watch Angel and Cameron Brink .

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 05:37

FoolishGrey wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 03:35

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 03:29

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 02:51

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 23:53

Not CC already 2nd in assist lmao
4th if you look at it per game instead of totals but still very impressive for a rookie who is supposedly having such a disappointing start to her career
It would be so much more if her teammates could actually make their open shots and layups. It's pretty impressive

That's a great point. Her assists would be way higher if she had half decent teammates.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 04:55

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 04:42

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 02:17
This sucks the part of getting “popular “ like I get it league needs to make money but I wish it was just base on the basketball
They talk about the foul like it sent cc to the hospital or something, it was dumb of her to do but we seen it many times in all levels in basketball
I fucken hate this bad discussion, I stop listening to them , and I bet cc hates this talk too
I wish I agreed with you, because there's nothing better than settling your differences w a good competition.

Clark is being targeted and the targeting is being applauded and justified.

da right? the way most people trying to dismiss this reality is very concerning. I mean I get it if it's only the toxic fans, but it's the players who are publicly showing their intentions and actually acting on it.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 04:42

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 02:17
This sucks the part of getting “popular “ like I get it league needs to make money but I wish it was just base on the basketball
They talk about the foul like it sent cc to the hospital or something, it was dumb of her to do but we seen it many times in all levels in basketball
I fucken hate this bad discussion, I stop listening to them , and I bet cc hates this talk too

I wish I agreed with you, because there's nothing better than settling your differences w a good competition.

Clark is being targeted and the targeting is being applauded and justified.

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 04:38

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 01:12
Someone needs to make a low-budget Tubi movie about Reese, Clark, and the WNBA.

It's comments like this that keep me coming back to lchat.

by **FoolishGrey** » Yesterday, 03:35

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 03:29

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 02:51

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 23:53

Not CC already 2nd in assist lmao
4th if you look at it per game instead of totals but still very impressive for a rookie who is supposedly having such a disappointing start to her career

It would be so much more if her teammates could actually make their open shots and layups. It's pretty impressive

by **Guest** » Yesterday, 03:29

Guest wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 02:51

Guest wrote: ↑
03 Jun 2024, 23:53

Not CC already 2nd in assist lmao

4th if you look at it per game instead of totals but still very impressive for a rookie who is supposedly having such a disappointing start to her career

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: WNBA - Part III