Women's College Basketball

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
=_= :nervous: :P :-/ :$ :eyeroll: :'( :( ^_^ 008 :hudoin: ^o) :unsure: <_< :fool: :blinkwide: :shifty: :lol: :mask: :yawn: :whistle: :queen: :wub: :angel: :gaypimp: :tinfoil: :hug: :dramaqueen: :dance2: :goldstar: :heart: :bigcry: :fingcross: :hmmm: :handbags: :nails: :rofl: :sadangel: :spy: :argh: :rage: :rageblush: :ragee:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Here you can select options for Topic and Post Reactions

Select Reactions Users Can’t use to react to your Posts

dramaqueen
thumbsup
wub
smile
creepy
nervous
cry
lol

Expand view Topic review: Women's College Basketball

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 13 minutes ago

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 18:50
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 15:04
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:35
Wow the Clark vs Bueckers debates have really ignited in the last couple days
The funny thing is this was all ignited by Geno’s comments praising Paige. Is he also supposed to kiss Clark’s ass?
da
Isn't he also the person most responsible for people thinking Paige wasn't the "best player in the country" by playing her our of position and not allowing Paige (and every other GREAT player he's EVER coached) to average more than 20 points? You take the best high school PG in the country and play her everywhere but PG?
This playing out of position thing is blown out of proportion. First of all, she wasn’t the best high school PG. She and Clark went back and forth at #1 all throughout high school. Second of all, she’s clearly more of a SG than a PG. If you watch UConn play they run so many set plays it’s not like the PG is fully running the offense, Paige would be doing what she’s doing now which is looking for her shot at any position. Geno’s said she’s only playing the 4 on the defensive end

I feel like it’s clear to see how they’ll be in the WNBA - Paige will be a midrange shooter and Clark will be a facilitator and three point shooter, like they are now. I guess some might prefer the first but I’m not sure why

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 22 minutes ago

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 15:04
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:35
Wow the Clark vs Bueckers debates have really ignited in the last couple days
The funny thing is this was all ignited by Geno’s comments praising Paige. Is he also supposed to kiss Clark’s ass?
I mean he didn’t have to kiss Clark’s ass, and of course every coach is going to say then have the player, but he lied. He said the stat sheet says she’s the best - that’s just not true. He’s purposefully saying that Clark is only getting praise because she’s famous and that’s simply not true

Also everyone lost their shit for Bluder directly answering a question as to why CC is better than Aliyah, so not sure why Geno shouldn’t face criticism for saying this shit completely unprovoked

Also for whoever said Clark had the better season but Paige the better month, that’s simply untrue. Paige has just played much easier opponents and had to do less carrying. Clark’s last month stats are still better than hers except for efficiency, which is understandable when you’re shooting more threes than twos (Paige went I think 0-5 from three her last game), and you’re the sole focus of defenses bc nobody else on your team can hit a shot

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 07:01

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 06:52

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 02:56

2024 March Madness women's TV times and schedule (all times ET)

Friday, March 29 — Sweet 16

(2) Notre Dame vs. (3) Oregon State | 2:30 p.m. | ESPN

(1) South Carolina vs. (4) Indiana | 5 p.m. | ESPN

(2) Stanford vs. (3) NC State | 7:30 p.m. | ESPN

(1) Texas vs. (4) Gonzaga | 10 p.m. | ESPN


Saturday, March 30 — Sweet 16

(3) LSU vs. (2) UCLA | 1 p.m. | ABC

(1) Iowa vs. (5) Colorado | 3:30 p.m. | ABC

(1) Southern California vs. (5) Baylor | 5:30 p.m. | ESPN

(3) UConn vs. (7) Duke | 8 p.m. | ESPN

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 01:35

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 01:24

Image

She seems to be friends with lots of players.
https://www.instagram.com/p/C5EwCXDr8B7/

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 00:39

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 00:34

Guest wrote:
Today, 00:10
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 23:33
Not in the portal yet? Man, if she leaves VT to go to Kentucky or some other school, that sucks for VT. It’s like kicking them while they’re down.

What would the benefit for her to transfer now as opposed to going into WNBA? I don’t really watch her enough to know how well she’ll do in the WNBA, so is she a question mark on making it? And if she were going pro, why wouldn’t she say it in her goodbye post?
da
She wouldn't have wrote "this place will always be home" if she was transferring.

S'he's a 1st round pick in all the mock drafts I've seen. The only question mark is her size. She's like Dana Evans.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 00:26

Guest wrote:
Today, 00:10
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 23:33
Not in the portal yet? Man, if she leaves VT to go to Kentucky or some other school, that sucks for VT. It’s like kicking them while they’re down.

What would the benefit for her to transfer now as opposed to going into WNBA? I don’t really watch her enough to know how well she’ll do in the WNBA, so is she a question mark on making it? And if she were going pro, why wouldn’t she say it in her goodbye post?
since she's Australian, if WNBA doesn't work out, she can always go to the Australian league, right?

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Today, 00:10

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 23:33
Not in the portal yet? Man, if she leaves VT to go to Kentucky or some other school, that sucks for VT. It’s like kicking them while they’re down.

What would the benefit for her to transfer now as opposed to going into WNBA? I don’t really watch her enough to know how well she’ll do in the WNBA, so is she a question mark on making it? And if she were going pro, why wouldn’t she say it in her goodbye post?

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 23:42

Image

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 23:37

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 23:33

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 23:00

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 21:20
Is this anything to worry about? :hmmm:


The Iowa St coach is known to be a jerk and not exactly player friendly.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 21:20

Is this anything to worry about? :hmmm:


Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 20:30

In advance of the 2024-25 upfront bazaar, GroupM—which last year controlled an estimated $64 billion in global media spend—not only plans to supercharge its annual investment in women’s sports but is also working toward developing a marketplace exclusively dedicated to transacting against an often-overlooked segment. GroupM clients that already have committed to up their women’s sports spend during the spring/summer ad sell-off include Adidas, Unilever, Google, Discover, Mars, Nationwide and Universal Pictures.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 19:31



Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 19:26

Guest wrote:
13 Mar 2024, 19:13
Guest wrote:
11 Mar 2024, 17:49
Slightly related topic. Will Clark make the Olympic team? I would say she needs to pay her dues in the WNBA first, but they actually need a point guard. And REALLY need to move on from Taurasi (who I know isn’t a point guard, but is taking a roster spot).
"I never been to France but I would love to go."

Hint...hint... :lol:

Someone got the hint. :lol:

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 19:07

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 18:50

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 15:04
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:35
Wow the Clark vs Bueckers debates have really ignited in the last couple days
The funny thing is this was all ignited by Geno’s comments praising Paige. Is he also supposed to kiss Clark’s ass?
da
Isn't he also the person most responsible for people thinking Paige wasn't the "best player in the country" by playing her our of position and not allowing Paige (and every other GREAT player he's EVER coached) to average more than 20 points? You take the best high school PG in the country and play her everywhere but PG?

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 18:39

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 15:04

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:35
Wow the Clark vs Bueckers debates have really ignited in the last couple days
The funny thing is this was all ignited by Geno’s comments praising Paige. Is he also supposed to kiss Clark’s ass?

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:54

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:43
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:35
Wow the Clark vs Bueckers debates have really ignited in the last couple days
People are just insane. Clark had the better season. Bueckers has been better the last month or so. They are both exceptional players and it is not clear who will be the better WNBA player.

They can both be good. And of course Geno is going to say his all-American is the best. That isn’t a slight on anyone else.
Yeah I need Clark to go off on Saturday so people remember who she really is. They’re both amazing players, 1A and 1B in college IMO.

She has looked so drained for awhile though. She handled the massive pressure and spotlight well for most of the season, but I’ve been wondering if it’s finally getting to her. The discourse this week especially has been absolutely insane.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:43

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:35
Wow the Clark vs Bueckers debates have really ignited in the last couple days
People are just insane. Clark had the better season. Bueckers has been better the last month or so. They are both exceptional players and it is not clear who will be the better WNBA player.

They can both be good. And of course Geno is going to say his all-American is the best. That isn’t a slight on anyone else.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:35

Wow the Clark vs Bueckers debates have really ignited in the last couple days

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 01:41

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 01:36
Watching Div II semifinals. Texas Woman's University is one of the teams, so I decided to look them up since I've never heard of this school and it's coeducational.
*Fixed

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » Yesterday, 01:36

Watching Div II semifinals. Texas Woman's College is one of the teams, so I decided to look them up since I've never heard of this school and it's coeducational.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by The Portal » Yesterday, 00:45

ESPN's Top 10 players in the transfer portal for the 2024-25 season, for now.
https://www.espn.com/womens-college-bas ... -25-season
1. Kaitlyn Chen, 5-9, G, Sr., Princeton Tigers
15.8 PTS, 3.5 REB, 4.9 AST, 48.8 FG%

2. Ajae Petty, 6-3, F, Sr., Kentucky Wildcats
14.2 PTS, 10.6 REB, 1.0 AST, 50.7 FG%

3. Taliah Scott, 5-9, G, Fr., Arkansas Razorbacks
22.1 PTS, 3.3 REB, 1.5 AST, 40.7 FG%

4. Saylor Poffenbarger, 6-2, G, Soph., Arkansas Razorbacks
10.2 PTS, 11.2 REB, 1.6 AST, 35.5 FG%

5. Maddie Scherr, 5-10, G, Sr., Kentucky Wildcats
12.5 PTS, 4.8 REB, 3.4 AST, 33.5 FG%

6. Eniya Russell, 6-0, G, Sr., Kentucky Wildcats
10.1 PTS, 3.6 REB, 1.5 AST, 41.2 FG%

7. Mama Dembele, 5-6, G, Sr., Missouri Tigers
10.2 PTS, 4.9 REB, 6.5 AST, 42.8 FG%

8. Kailyn Gilbert, 5-8, G, Soph., Arizona Wildcats
15.1 PTS, 5.3 REB, 2.3 AST, 41.9 FG%

9. Izzy Higginbottom, 5-7, G, Jr., Arkansas State Red Wolves
22.2 PTS, 4.0 REB, 3.7 AST, 46.2 FG%

10. Terren Ward, 5-11, G, Sr., Georgia Southern Eagles
22.0 PTS, 9.1 REB, 1.9 AST, 39.6 FG%

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 20:43

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 19:48

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 19:20



espnW Rankings Class of 2020
1. Paige Bueckers
2. Angel Reese
3. Cameron Brink
4. Caitlin Clark
5. Kamilla Cardoso

Re: Women's College Basketball

by TV Ratings » 27 Mar 2024, 18:10

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 18:03

:rofl: Old guys trying to get a free ride on the Caitlin Clark hype train. :rofl:

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 17:51

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 17:32

Guest wrote:
27 Mar 2024, 12:57
Interested to see how Clark comes out playing on Saturday. Lots of ridiculous discourse around her on court ~attitude~, team not looking great against WVU, her still in a shooting slump.

She needs to channel whatever energy she was on at this time last year in the tournament because this is about the same time she started going nuclear.
An article also came out where the Colorado players straight up said they’re going try to get into her head so I hope she sees that and realizes the smart strategy is just to go dead eyes and just destroy like she did in Louisville and SC last year

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 12:57

Interested to see how Clark comes out playing on Saturday. Lots of ridiculous discourse around her on court ~attitude~, team not looking great against WVU, her still in a shooting slump.

She needs to channel whatever energy she was on at this time last year in the tournament because this is about the same time she started going nuclear.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 03:47

Guest wrote:
27 Mar 2024, 02:56
Is JuJu Watkins fam?
I don’t really pay close attention to her but the ppl on the other board say she’s straight and they usually have the tea. They knew about CC’s bf way before they even soft launched. But Juju is only 18 so idk if anyone really knows.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 02:56

Is JuJu Watkins fam?

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 01:43

Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 21:23
All of the “refs/NCAA wouldn’t let Clark lose!!!” takes are so stupid to me because if that’s the case why give them the worst draw? NCAA could’ve made their road to the final four a lot easier if they REALLY wanted to make sure they stuck around.

They had the highest rated 8 seed, WVU had a NET of 21 which is higher than all the other 8s and most of the 6s and 7s. Then they have one of the tougher 4s and 5s, toughest 3 seed, and probably second toughest 2 next to Stanford.
It shows people don’t watch and just want to hate, obviously WV had more fouls, their whole game plan is to be super physical and make steals. Every single team that play gets like 20 more FTs than them

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 27 Mar 2024, 00:12

Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 23:46
Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 21:23
All of the “refs/NCAA wouldn’t let Clark lose!!!” takes are so stupid to me because if that’s the case why give them the worst draw? NCAA could’ve made their road to the final four a lot easier if they REALLY wanted to make sure they stuck around.

They had the highest rated 8 seed, WVU had a NET of 21 which is higher than all the other 8s and most of the 6s and 7s. Then they have one of the tougher 4s and 5s, toughest 3 seed, and probably second toughest 2 next to Stanford.
They just hate that a white girl taking away all the attention lol
Maybe they should watch LSU and SC instead obsessing over Clark then they should know how biased the refs towards LSU and SC too
Da
My complaints with refs are they are all to inconsistent and insert themselves in games when they shouldn’t. I think the UConn game last night was a good example where a review went on way too long and messed with the flow of the game in the 4th. I also really wish the would enforce the flopping rule because there way to many players who taking advantage of refs not enforcing the rule.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 26 Mar 2024, 23:46

Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 21:23
All of the “refs/NCAA wouldn’t let Clark lose!!!” takes are so stupid to me because if that’s the case why give them the worst draw? NCAA could’ve made their road to the final four a lot easier if they REALLY wanted to make sure they stuck around.

They had the highest rated 8 seed, WVU had a NET of 21 which is higher than all the other 8s and most of the 6s and 7s. Then they have one of the tougher 4s and 5s, toughest 3 seed, and probably second toughest 2 next to Stanford.
They just hate that a white girl taking away all the attention lol
Maybe they should watch LSU and SC instead obsessing over Clark then they should know how biased the refs towards LSU and SC too

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 26 Mar 2024, 21:23

All of the “refs/NCAA wouldn’t let Clark lose!!!” takes are so stupid to me because if that’s the case why give them the worst draw? NCAA could’ve made their road to the final four a lot easier if they REALLY wanted to make sure they stuck around.

They had the highest rated 8 seed, WVU had a NET of 21 which is higher than all the other 8s and most of the 6s and 7s. Then they have one of the tougher 4s and 5s, toughest 3 seed, and probably second toughest 2 next to Stanford.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Awards Season » 26 Mar 2024, 18:48

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 26 Mar 2024, 18:19

I think Amoore was most likely not coming back anyways. She's projected as a first rounder in the draft and her NIL is limited as an international student. If not the WNBA, she can go always go pro back home.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 26 Mar 2024, 17:55

This means Georgia declares for the draft, right?

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 26 Mar 2024, 17:39



Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 26 Mar 2024, 17:35

Re: Women's College Basketball

by TV Ratings » 26 Mar 2024, 17:15


.
.
.

Re: Women's College Basketball

by Guest » 26 Mar 2024, 16:46

Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 16:39
Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 16:05
Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 03:21
Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 03:13
Guest wrote:
26 Mar 2024, 03:05


I want UCLA to make the final 4, simply because I don’t want IA or LSU to 🤷‍♀️🤣
haha, UCLA catching all the hater "fans." does it matter in the end anyway? can any team actually beat SC? the team that came closest this year already lost today.
Can they beat SC, probably not. But i would prefer not to see final 4 coverage and stories all focus on a single player. Give a team like SC a fair amount of media for how their season has gone.
I feel like I don’t mind the Clark coverage, both because I like her but also she’s the best player it makes sense to highlight her. There’s a reason she’s bringing in views - people want to see her. Everyone can act like there’s multiple players doing what she does but the fact is there isn’t

If anything I’m more frustrated by teams like LSU and UConn getting the team coverage, that should go to SC as they’re the best team
Yeah, it feels like SC is a bit under the radar as the #1 team, but they don’t have that big breakout star I assume is why. Whenever I see something on them, it’s usually about Staley.
The thing with SC is they’re so good it’s almost “boring”

It’s not as fun for casual fans to watch and talk about an undefeated team winning by 20 every game. The other teams have stars with big storylines and their games are more competitive.

Top