WNBA - Part III

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
=_= :nervous: :P :-/ :$ :eyeroll: :'( :( ^_^ 008 :hudoin: ^o) :unsure: <_< :fool: :blinkwide: :shifty: :lol: :mask: :yawn: :whistle: :queen: :wub: :angel: :gaypimp: :tinfoil: :hug: :dramaqueen: :dance2: :goldstar: :heart: :bigcry: :fingcross: :hmmm: :handbags: :nails: :rofl: :sadangel: :spy: :argh: :rage: :rageblush: :ragee:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Here you can select options for Topic and Post Reactions

Select Reactions Users Can’t use to react to your Posts

dramaqueen
thumbsup
wub
smile
creepy
nervous
cry
lol

Expand view Topic review: WNBA - Part III

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 10:33

Guest wrote:
Today, 04:25
Guest wrote:
Today, 04:04
Guest wrote:
Today, 03:33
These teams with tiny areas have got to move to bigger venues. If you want to be taken seriously you can't play in arenas smaller than a mid-major college.
What's the capacity of these tiny arenas?
Unacceptable:
Gateway Center Arena (Atlanta Dream) – 3,500 Seats
Entertainment and Sports Arena (Washington Mystics) – 4,200
College Park Center (Dallas Wings) – 7,000
Mohegan Sun Arena (Connecticut Sun) – 9,323
Wintrust Arena (Chicago Sky) – 10,387

Barely passable:
Michelob Ultra Arena (Las Vegas Aces) – 12,000

Major league:
Barclays Center (New York Liberty) – 17,732
Gainbridge Fieldhouse (Indiana Fever) - 17,923
Climate Pledge Arena (Seattle Storm) – 18,100
Talking Stick Resort Arena (Phoenix Mercury) – 18,422
Staples Center (Los Angeles Sparks) – 18,997
Target Center (Minnesota Lynx) – 19,356
I don’t really know how they pick draftees or the top draft, but with the low number of seats was it ever very likely that Caitlin Clark would be sent to any team with less seats than the big arenas? Business wise it makes sense to send her somewhere you can sale more seats.

I couldn’t imagine her going to Atlanta and only having 3,500 seats to sale. That seems like a huge disadvantage for the Dream if the NCAAW and league keeps growing.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 06:54

Kelley is hot

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 06:30

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 06:25

I like the Fila shoes

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 05:40

From last year but still relevant.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 04:57

Guest wrote:
Today, 04:25
Guest wrote:
Today, 04:04
Guest wrote:
Today, 03:33
These teams with tiny areas have got to move to bigger venues. If you want to be taken seriously you can't play in arenas smaller than a mid-major college.
What's the capacity of these tiny arenas?
Unacceptable:
Gateway Center Arena (Atlanta Dream) – 3,500 Seats
Entertainment and Sports Arena (Washington Mystics) – 4,200
College Park Center (Dallas Wings) – 7,000
Mohegan Sun Arena (Connecticut Sun) – 9,323
Wintrust Arena (Chicago Sky) – 10,387

Barely passable:
Michelob Ultra Arena (Las Vegas Aces) – 12,000

Major league:
Barclays Center (New York Liberty) – 17,732
Gainbridge Fieldhouse (Indiana Fever) - 17,923
Climate Pledge Arena (Seattle Storm) – 18,100
Talking Stick Resort Arena (Phoenix Mercury) – 18,422
Staples Center (Los Angeles Sparks) – 18,997
Target Center (Minnesota Lynx) – 19,356
Yeah under 5,000 arena is unacceptable

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 04:25

Guest wrote:
Today, 04:04
Guest wrote:
Today, 03:33
These teams with tiny areas have got to move to bigger venues. If you want to be taken seriously you can't play in arenas smaller than a mid-major college.
What's the capacity of these tiny arenas?
Unacceptable:
Gateway Center Arena (Atlanta Dream) – 3,500 Seats
Entertainment and Sports Arena (Washington Mystics) – 4,200
College Park Center (Dallas Wings) – 7,000
Mohegan Sun Arena (Connecticut Sun) – 9,323
Wintrust Arena (Chicago Sky) – 10,387

Barely passable:
Michelob Ultra Arena (Las Vegas Aces) – 12,000

Major league:
Barclays Center (New York Liberty) – 17,732
Gainbridge Fieldhouse (Indiana Fever) - 17,923
Climate Pledge Arena (Seattle Storm) – 18,100
Talking Stick Resort Arena (Phoenix Mercury) – 18,422
Staples Center (Los Angeles Sparks) – 18,997
Target Center (Minnesota Lynx) – 19,356

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 04:25

Guest wrote:
Today, 03:33
These teams with tiny areas have got to move to bigger venues. If you want to be taken seriously you can't play in arenas smaller than a mid-major college.
lol only Aces that sold out their tickets they carry the league

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 04:04

Guest wrote:
Today, 03:33
These teams with tiny areas have got to move to bigger venues. If you want to be taken seriously you can't play in arenas smaller than a mid-major college.
What's the capacity of these tiny arenas?

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 04:01

Guest wrote:
Today, 03:40
50% off is hella aggressive. Should save that for Back-to-school or Black Friday or something like that.

Oh lemme buy one for my sister

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 03:41

Guest wrote:
Today, 03:33
These teams with tiny areas have got to move to bigger venues. If you want to be taken seriously you can't play in arenas smaller than a mid-major college.
Da It looks ridiculous that these teams are moving arenas to accommodate an opposing player. Your team should get this treatment all the time.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 03:40

50% off is hella aggressive. Should save that for Back-to-school or Black Friday or something like that.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 03:33

These teams with tiny areas have got to move to bigger venues. If you want to be taken seriously you can't play in arenas smaller than a mid-major college.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 03:10

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 03:01

That spice girl song lol

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 02:23

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 02:03

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 23:07
And they're still fucking expensive :unsure:

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 01:54

Becky be like give me all the gays I've had enough with pregnancies from the straights

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 01:49

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Today, 00:20

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 23:54

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 23:07

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 23:02

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 15:19

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:29
It seems like it would be difficult to do, but what is the chance Indiana some how screws this up and continues to be dysfunctional?

Feels like they are going to have locker room issues. And I have no faith in their front office.
Nobody knows , they seem to try to do a lot of marketing
But at the end of day it has to do with basketball game and wins , if they do better like playoff it be good for the league and later they just have to surround her with better talent to win trophy
For me she is the new curry, with her ability to pass and shoot, but even curry lacks defensive and that something the other around her will need to adopt
It’s just to early to know how this will go , but I hope for best for the league

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 15:10

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:42

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:29
It seems like it would be difficult to do, but what is the chance Indiana some how screws this up and continues to be dysfunctional?

Feels like they are going to have locker room issues. And I have no faith in their front office.
What did I miss lol

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:40

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:37
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:00
CC will flop so much in the WNBA
I doubt that. If you can shoot at an elite level like she can, you will be just fine. Hoping for her downfall doesn’t help the league either.
a good defense and Caitlin no longer exists on the court

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:39

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:32
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:00
CC will flop so much in the WNBA
Maybe. But it's irrelevant. The point is to keep the momentum going and get more viewers for the league. And most important, Angel Reese is hawt. So is Nyadiew Puoch. I want to walk around with them on each arm sneering at all the other lesbians who don't have 2 glamazon girlfriends.

Image
Greedy af

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:37

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:00
CC will flop so much in the WNBA
I doubt that. If you can shoot at an elite level like she can, you will be just fine. Hoping for her downfall doesn’t help the league either.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:36

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:18
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:00
CC will flop so much in the WNBA
She is going to be fine. Her floor is like good starting point guard and all-star.

There is a lot of area between averaging 30+ points and being a perennial MVP candidate and flopping.
DA Clark recent interview, she knows she won't do lot of scoring herself, she's focusing on being a good passer, mainly feeding Boston since they already played together in U19.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:32

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:00
CC will flop so much in the WNBA
Maybe. But it's irrelevant. The point is to keep the momentum going and get more viewers for the league. And most important, Angel Reese is hawt. So is Nyadiew Puoch. I want to walk around with them on each arm sneering at all the other lesbians who don't have 2 glamazon girlfriends.

Image

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:29

It seems like it would be difficult to do, but what is the chance Indiana some how screws this up and continues to be dysfunctional?

Feels like they are going to have locker room issues. And I have no faith in their front office.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:22



https://people.com/brittney-griner-wife ... by-8631235

This is great news, but it also reminds me of my inappropriate attraction to Cherelle.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:18

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 14:00
CC will flop so much in the WNBA
She is going to be fine. Her floor is like good starting point guard and all-star.

There is a lot of area between averaging 30+ points and being a perennial MVP candidate and flopping.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:08

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:53
I had to google sabrina shoes and yes they nice, i can see myself buying them for the gym or running
https://www.nike.com/t/sabrina-1-dedica ... FQ3381-103
Right? She has good management team around her. Because most of recent NBA players shoes are ugly af

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 14:00

CC will flop so much in the WNBA

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 13:56

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:50
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:42
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:26
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:23
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:04
lol I can't with these wnba players if they want a shoe deal they should tell their agent to negotiate or jump ship to another brand that will give them a shoe deal.
Whining on twitter will get them a shoe deal?
Those twitter stans will buy their shoes?
Clark already showed that people will spend money on her.
They should sign to Chinese brands, instant signature shoes. :lol:

I dunno why are they surprised CC will be paid by nike and will have her own signature shoes, she's the most popular and most marketable women's basketball player right now.
the part its a 10million deal its crazy, probaly not for a year but as someone who doesnt even buy basketball shoes its crazy lol they must think they going to sell amazing
Her jersey is like 99 bucks and selling well. Shoes probably like 120 bucks like sabrina. But sabrina is a nice looking shoes that also catered for non basketball fans not some ugly gimmicky shoes.
Da I honestly don’t think people even buy the shoe because Sabrina’s name is attached. They buy it because it is Nike and they like the way it looks.
IMO That actually would be better for long term success because hype and popularity will die down fast

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 13:53

I had to google sabrina shoes and yes they nice, i can see myself buying them for the gym or running
https://www.nike.com/t/sabrina-1-dedica ... FQ3381-103

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 13:50

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:42
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:26
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:23
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:04
lol I can't with these wnba players if they want a shoe deal they should tell their agent to negotiate or jump ship to another brand that will give them a shoe deal.
Whining on twitter will get them a shoe deal?
Those twitter stans will buy their shoes?
Clark already showed that people will spend money on her.
They should sign to Chinese brands, instant signature shoes. :lol:

I dunno why are they surprised CC will be paid by nike and will have her own signature shoes, she's the most popular and most marketable women's basketball player right now.
the part its a 10million deal its crazy, probaly not for a year but as someone who doesnt even buy basketball shoes its crazy lol they must think they going to sell amazing
Her jersey is like 99 bucks and selling well. Shoes probably like 120 bucks like sabrina. But sabrina is a nice looking shoes that also catered for non basketball fans not some ugly gimmicky shoes.
Da I honestly don’t think people even buy the shoe because Sabrina’s name is attached. They buy it because it is Nike and they like the way it looks.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 13:42

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:26
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:23
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:04
lol I can't with these wnba players if they want a shoe deal they should tell their agent to negotiate or jump ship to another brand that will give them a shoe deal.
Whining on twitter will get them a shoe deal?
Those twitter stans will buy their shoes?
Clark already showed that people will spend money on her.
They should sign to Chinese brands, instant signature shoes. :lol:

I dunno why are they surprised CC will be paid by nike and will have her own signature shoes, she's the most popular and most marketable women's basketball player right now.
the part its a 10million deal its crazy, probaly not for a year but as someone who doesnt even buy basketball shoes its crazy lol they must think they going to sell amazing
Her jersey is like 99 bucks and selling well. Shoes probably like 120 bucks like sabrina. But sabrina is a nice looking shoes that also catered for non basketball fans not some ugly gimmicky shoes.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 13:32

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 13:26
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:23
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:04
lol I can't with these wnba players if they want a shoe deal they should tell their agent to negotiate or jump ship to another brand that will give them a shoe deal.
Whining on twitter will get them a shoe deal?
Those twitter stans will buy their shoes?
Clark already showed that people will spend money on her.
They should sign to Chinese brands, instant signature shoes. :lol:

I dunno why are they surprised CC will be paid by nike and will have her own signature shoes, she's the most popular and most marketable women's basketball player right now.
the part its a 10million deal its crazy, probaly not for a year but as someone who doesnt even buy basketball shoes its crazy lol they must think they going to sell amazing
They will sell a ton of shoes. But the deal will also include Clark doing Nike ads in general and wearing the shoes during games as well

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 13:31

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 04:44
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 04:21
Who are the tanking teams this year? ATL? LA? DC? Lynx? Sky? Any others? :hmmm:
Current odds have LA, CHI, and DC all at +8000 and MIN and ATL at +5000 to win the title. DC has ATL’s first round pick next year so not as much reason for ATL to tank hard.

The big question though is where the league is gonna put the Bay Area team in the draft order. If they are given the #1 pick no one is gonna actively tank since there’s a big drop off between Paige and the rest of the pack in this draft class. I think I read that the current rules state that expansion teams draft after the lottery teams but I don’t know if that’s accurate or if it could be changed before next year.
As a Minnesota fan, I wish we would tank for Paige or make some good decisions (wtf was this year’s draft). Instead we are stuck in the same hamster wheel as other Minnesota sports. Not good, but not bad enough to get the draft capital to fully rebuild.

Our biggest hope at this point is that Caitlin or Paige want to play for us when they are finally free agents in 5 years 😭.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 13:26

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:23
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:04
lol I can't with these wnba players if they want a shoe deal they should tell their agent to negotiate or jump ship to another brand that will give them a shoe deal.
Whining on twitter will get them a shoe deal?
Those twitter stans will buy their shoes?
Clark already showed that people will spend money on her.
They should sign to Chinese brands, instant signature shoes. :lol:

I dunno why are they surprised CC will be paid by nike and will have her own signature shoes, she's the most popular and most marketable women's basketball player right now.
the part its a 10million deal its crazy, probaly not for a year but as someone who doesnt even buy basketball shoes its crazy lol they must think they going to sell amazing

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 11:23

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 11:04
lol I can't with these wnba players if they want a shoe deal they should tell their agent to negotiate or jump ship to another brand that will give them a shoe deal.
Whining on twitter will get them a shoe deal?
Those twitter stans will buy their shoes?
Clark already showed that people will spend money on her.
They should sign to Chinese brands, instant signature shoes. :lol:

I dunno why are they surprised CC will be paid by nike and will have her own signature shoes, she's the most popular and most marketable women's basketball player right now.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 11:04

lol I can't with these wnba players if they want a shoe deal they should tell their agent to negotiate or jump ship to another brand that will give them a shoe deal.
Whining on twitter will get them a shoe deal?
Those twitter stans will buy their shoes?
Clark already showed that people will spend money on her.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 08:17


Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 07:53

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 07:38
They def tanking for Paige...or pick Azzi at #3. :lol:

Oof yeah lol. It’s actually not crazy farfetched that they could get both since they have ATL’s pick too. But I think it’s likely Azzi stays for a fifth year.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 07:38

They def tanking for Paige...or pick Azzi at #3. :lol:

Re: WNBA - Part III

by Guest » Yesterday, 07:26

Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 06:39
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 06:14
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 05:50
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 05:20
Guest wrote:
Yesterday, 05:16


You shouldn't worry Fever won’t be in the playoffs
With the number of teams tanking for Paige, they make the playoffs by default. :lol:
Why would anyone tanking for Paige?
She’s an incredible talent with a massive fanbase that would financially change the landscape of a franchise overnight?
We're talking about Paige here not Clark
Clark is an elite shooter and a great passer but Paige is better all around. If not for injuries (but that’s the nature of sports), she’d be right up there. Bueckers is going to the be the #1 pick next year and teams will tank to get her.

Re: WNBA - Part III

by The Portal » Yesterday, 07:14

Do people still care about the Cavindar twins? :hmmm:


Top