by Guest » Today, 17:52
Guest wrote: ↑Today, 15:37
Guest wrote: ↑Today, 15:01
Guest wrote: ↑Today, 12:10
Guest wrote: ↑Today, 11:36
Guest wrote: ↑Today, 08:17
Since when did Mamamoo+ touched their pussy and licked their fingers infront of university students aka, barely adults. The main reason Hwasa is investigated is because she did it infront of university students, no one cares if it's in their own concerts
Yes yes, blame Hwasa who is not even in this subunit.
Barely adults when the MC, who is a student there, was humping the floor on stage right before her performance.
And if you even have a slight idea of how law and order works, you would have known that it doesnt matter if it was their own concert, you just need someone to file a complain. Someone could have file a complaint over Shinee even if it was their own damn concert.
Meanwhile this forum turn around the praise the others for any vaguely suggestive thing they do on stage, calling them brave because Korea is conservative.
Uneducated AND a hypocrite.
DA
As much as I understand your rage (especially if you are a Hyejin stan), OP's idea is not that farfetched. The Malaysian government has been cracking down on foreign artists whose performances they consider go against public morals. A general search for Mamamoo+ does not filter out Mamamoo results - in fact, even Koreans occasionally wonder if Mamamoo have lost two members and continued as a duo. Now try to think about potentially controversial content that the Malaysian government would try to filter out. Surely, Moonsun have slapped each other's asses on stage and have tons of questionable homosexual behaviour on and off stage - but when does that ever make the news? Surely, Moonbyul has written the lesbian kpop anthem of the century, but did that ever make the news and would the Malaysian government even bother checking the lyrics for every single one of Mamamoo's 400-song discography? Meanwhile, Hwasa's university "controversy" is still ongoing and was all over the place when it first started - even English news talked about it. It's really easy to see how some conservative bigot looking for trouble wouldn't make the effort to look into it in detail and just go "uh oh one of these Mamamoo people is involved in 'obscene acts' " and that would be just enough for a permit denial. It's not fair to Hwasa nor to Moonsun but Hwasa DOES have the most "scandalous" track record.
The reply above this reply already included the points i wanted to address so i will not repeat it.
Honestly you can pepper your reply with all the 'it is not fair BUT...', 'as much as I understand' and 'surely' to act neutral BUT it will just reveal your own biasness in this matter.
As someone said above, there are other Acts that were rejected who do not have any big news recently either. I feel sorry for MS if you and some others are seriously attributing this to Hwasa, when just the mere fact that MMM+ are a well known enough foreign act, is a good enough reason for the Malaysian government to not grant the permit.
The pot calling the kettle black when you say the anon is biased and you yourself drop a 'I feel sorry for MS when you're attributing this to Hwasa'. The comment you're replying to was pretty polite and pretty neutral but you're the one who seems to be desperate to save Hwasa's face in spite of MS and Mamamoo as a whole.
"The pot calling the kettle black when you say the anon is biased and you yourself drop a 'I feel sorry for MS when you're attributing this to Hwasa'."
Explain how the quote is bias? Did you even read the whole sentence? I feel sorry for MS because they are well known ON THEIR OWN. Which part is bias or a slight at MS? Anyone else thinking MS are not their own reason for the permit being rejected are the ones who are slighting them.
"The comment you're replying to was pretty polite and pretty neutral but you're the one who seems to be desperate to save Hwasa's face in spite of MS and Mamamoo as a whole."
Polite, maybe yes, neutral? Just the fact that the OP failed to consider other points in their analysis made it anything but neutral.
"but you're the one who seems to be desperate to save Hwasa's face in spite of MS and Mamamoo as a whole."
I don't even know what you are trying to say here. If i understood correctly, you think Hwasa is the reason and hence I'm trying to save her face by spiting on MS and MMM? If so, what a reveal, another one who believe that Hwasa is the reason and trying to act unbias omg. There is nothing to save and nothing in my reply is close to disrespecting ANY other member. The only people I'm shading are moos and as far as I'm aware, you are not MMM nor MMM+ nor any members and yes I can shade you as much as I want.
[quote=Guest post_id=5264391 time=1696088275]
[quote=Guest post_id=5264390 time=1696086114]
[quote=Guest post_id=5264366 time=1696075817]
[quote=Guest post_id=5264364 time=1696073804]
[quote=Guest post_id=5264357 time=1696061831]
Since when did Mamamoo+ touched their pussy and licked their fingers infront of university students aka, barely adults. The main reason Hwasa is investigated is because she did it infront of university students, no one cares if it's in their own concerts
[/quote]
Yes yes, blame Hwasa who is not even in this subunit.
Barely adults when the MC, who is a student there, was humping the floor on stage right before her performance.
And if you even have a slight idea of how law and order works, you would have known that it doesnt matter if it was their own concert, you just need someone to file a complain. Someone could have file a complaint over Shinee even if it was their own damn concert.
Meanwhile this forum turn around the praise the others for any vaguely suggestive thing they do on stage, calling them brave because Korea is conservative.
Uneducated AND a hypocrite.
[/quote]
DA
As much as I understand your rage (especially if you are a Hyejin stan), OP's idea is not that farfetched. The Malaysian government has been cracking down on foreign artists whose performances they consider go against public morals. A general search for Mamamoo+ does not filter out Mamamoo results - in fact, even Koreans occasionally wonder if Mamamoo have lost two members and continued as a duo. Now try to think about potentially controversial content that the Malaysian government would try to filter out. Surely, Moonsun have slapped each other's asses on stage and have tons of questionable homosexual behaviour on and off stage - but when does that ever make the news? Surely, Moonbyul has written the lesbian kpop anthem of the century, but did that ever make the news and would the Malaysian government even bother checking the lyrics for every single one of Mamamoo's 400-song discography? Meanwhile, Hwasa's university "controversy" is still ongoing and was all over the place when it first started - even English news talked about it. It's really easy to see how some conservative bigot looking for trouble wouldn't make the effort to look into it in detail and just go "uh oh one of these Mamamoo people is involved in 'obscene acts' " and that would be just enough for a permit denial. It's not fair to Hwasa nor to Moonsun but Hwasa DOES have the most "scandalous" track record.
[/quote]
The reply above this reply already included the points i wanted to address so i will not repeat it.
Honestly you can pepper your reply with all the 'it is not fair BUT...', 'as much as I understand' and 'surely' to act neutral BUT it will just reveal your own biasness in this matter.
As someone said above, there are other Acts that were rejected who do not have any big news recently either. I feel sorry for MS if you and some others are seriously attributing this to Hwasa, when just the mere fact that MMM+ are a well known enough foreign act, is a good enough reason for the Malaysian government to not grant the permit.
[/quote]
The pot calling the kettle black when you say the anon is biased and you yourself drop a 'I feel sorry for MS when you're attributing this to Hwasa'. The comment you're replying to was pretty polite and pretty neutral but you're the one who seems to be desperate to save Hwasa's face in spite of MS and Mamamoo as a whole.
[/quote]
"The pot calling the kettle black when you say the anon is biased and you yourself drop a 'I feel sorry for MS when you're attributing this to Hwasa'."
Explain how the quote is bias? Did you even read the whole sentence? I feel sorry for MS because they are well known ON THEIR OWN. Which part is bias or a slight at MS? Anyone else thinking MS are not their own reason for the permit being rejected are the ones who are slighting them.
"The comment you're replying to was pretty polite and pretty neutral but you're the one who seems to be desperate to save Hwasa's face in spite of MS and Mamamoo as a whole."
Polite, maybe yes, neutral? Just the fact that the OP failed to consider other points in their analysis made it anything but neutral.
"but you're the one who seems to be desperate to save Hwasa's face in spite of MS and Mamamoo as a whole."
I don't even know what you are trying to say here. If i understood correctly, you think Hwasa is the reason and hence I'm trying to save her face by spiting on MS and MMM? If so, what a reveal, another one who believe that Hwasa is the reason and trying to act unbias omg. There is nothing to save and nothing in my reply is close to disrespecting ANY other member. The only people I'm shading are moos and as far as I'm aware, you are not MMM nor MMM+ nor any members and yes I can shade you as much as I want.